westoelad wrote:I think the squad is named in batting order with Richardson/Trevaskis, McCarthy and Whitehead being omitted.
Yes, think you're right.
westoelad wrote:I think the squad is named in batting order with Richardson/Trevaskis, McCarthy and Whitehead being omitted.
captaincolly wrote:westoelad wrote:I think the squad is named in batting order with Richardson/Trevaskis, McCarthy and Whitehead being omitted.
Yes, think you're right.
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:westoelad wrote:I think the squad is named in batting order with Richardson/Trevaskis, McCarthy and Whitehead being omitted.
Yes, think you're right.
Worrying though if we think the same as JJ
Durhamfootman wrote:I note that the terrific brainwave to bring bowlers in to bat at 4, throw their wickets away, encourage the opposition bowlers and stall our assault, is still proving to be this year's cunning plan (so cunning that no other teams think it's a good idea). Maybe we should just slot Stokes in there and have someone who knows how to take advantage of a good start for a change
westoelad wrote:Lovely tweet from @ChrisRush22
At the game last Friday someone told me there was a guy attending his first game at the ripe old age of 102. I thought this was bloody amazing so I decided to go and say hello and tell him how much we appreciated him coming. I also have him one of my shirts as a thank you.
Durhamfootman wrote:says something about the last couple of games, that I'm not actively hoping for the point that a rained off game would bring
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 90 guests