Durhamfootman wrote:OFFS...... 2 in 2 again.... same batsmen
captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:OFFS...... 2 in 2 again.... same batsmen
Typical!
Durhamfootman wrote:both clean bowled, presumably trying to hit it out of the park
and so we end up finishing the last couple of overs scratching about again
still..... 220 is a good score and the fact that I wanted even more is entirely a reflection on our bowling prowess
Durhamfootman wrote:their spinners and medium pacers went at about 10 an over. We have seamers who are quite capable of going for twice as many as that
captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:both clean bowled, presumably trying to hit it out of the park
and so we end up finishing the last couple of overs scratching about again
still..... 220 is a good score and the fact that I wanted even more is entirely a reflection on our bowling prowess
My thoughts exactly. Trying to remember how many we got last year in that game ( against Worcs?) where Colly got a hundred and we never remotely looked like defending them. Of course Tahir wasn't there then.
captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:both clean bowled, presumably trying to hit it out of the park
and so we end up finishing the last couple of overs scratching about again
still..... 220 is a good score and the fact that I wanted even more is entirely a reflection on our bowling prowess
My thoughts exactly. Trying to remember how many we got last year in that game ( against Worcs?) where Colly got a hundred and we never remotely looked like defending them. Of course Tahir wasn't there then.
Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:both clean bowled, presumably trying to hit it out of the park
and so we end up finishing the last couple of overs scratching about again
still..... 220 is a good score and the fact that I wanted even more is entirely a reflection on our bowling prowess
My thoughts exactly. Trying to remember how many we got last year in that game ( against Worcs?) where Colly got a hundred and we never remotely looked like defending them. Of course Tahir wasn't there then.
was that the one where Clarke went berserk and flayed us to all parts?
Durhamfootman wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:both clean bowled, presumably trying to hit it out of the park
and so we end up finishing the last couple of overs scratching about again
still..... 220 is a good score and the fact that I wanted even more is entirely a reflection on our bowling prowess
My thoughts exactly. Trying to remember how many we got last year in that game ( against Worcs?) where Colly got a hundred and we never remotely looked like defending them. Of course Tahir wasn't there then.
was that the one where Clarke went berserk and flayed us to all parts?
yeah it was
knocked off 202 with 2 overs to spare. 124 off 72
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests