Page 78 of 197
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 11:42 amby captaincolly
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:Colly was hugely critical of the pink ball, if I remember correctly.
perhaps scathing would be a better word
Yep. Think John Hastings ( who was playing for Worcs ) was also very critical - Lewis said at the forum he doesn't like if either.
In fact I don't remember any positive feedback at all from around the circuit...so naturally FTECB continue with the experiment. Brilliant scheduling too to have these matches played when the sun doesn't set until after the close of play.
It actually would have been brilliant scheduling if they'd play as normal with a red ball with normal light. If bad natural light stops play then make up for it by starting earlier next day.
Offer entry after 4pm for £5 with accompanied kids free. Make a kill on refreshments etc with kids in.
Good idea. Needs some innovative thinking but FTECB don't do that.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 1:43 pmby captaincolly
No uncontested toss. Warcs won it and are batting.
Davies and Pringle in for Poynter and Coughlin.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 2:27 pmby captaincolly
No wickets after almost half an hour and I've already got a bad feeling about this!
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 2:32 pmby captaincolly
captaincolly wrote:No wickets after almost half an hour and I've already got a bad feeling about this!
17/1. Must get rid of Bell before he settles.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:27 pmby captaincolly
Bell gone to Salisbury. 52/2. Now get rid of Trott! It'll probably be one of those times where the ones we regard as the dangermen fail but someone relatively unheralded gets a hundred.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:34 pmby captaincolly
We could do without Rimmington going at almost 5 an over when the overall rate is under 3.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 5:44 pmby captaincolly
A wicket straight after the break but once again not followed up and another decent partnership established!
It would have been interesting (if that's the right word) to see how many wickets we'd have lost by this stage.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 5:49 pmby captaincolly
captaincolly wrote:A wicket straight after the break but once again not followed up and another decent partnership established!
It would have been interesting (if that's the right word) to see how many wickets we'd have lost by this stage.
And of course after saying that they have taken a wicket. Salisbury again, Trott still there though 130/4.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 7:41 pmby captaincolly
Warwickshire slowly progressing towards a big score. It must mean conditions are excellent for batting so we will also prosper with the bat. What could possibly go wrong.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 8:23 pmby captaincolly
This bowling attack is far too weak - Rimmington as one of three specialist seamers and a non-spinning spinner. No wonder Warwickshire wanted to bat.
Even worse is - despite only having those 3 main bowlers - the batting looks weak too.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:10 pmby Durhamfootman
Trotty still there, and now joined by Mr it's Durham so I want my obligatory double ton Barker. 500 for 6 by lunch tomorrow, I reckon
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Mon Jun 25, 2018 9:29 pmby captaincolly
297/5 at the close. Only positive is the slow rate of scoring but 5 wickets is a poor return. Can't see how this attack will ever bowl a good side out cheaply unless conditions are in their favour.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:05 amby westoelad
captaincolly wrote:297/5 at the close. Only positive is the slow rate of scoring but 5 wickets is a poor return. Can't see how this attack will ever bowl a good side out cheaply unless conditions are in their favour.
Slow pitch so you need to be patient!_- that's us knackered.
Reckon Salisbury has shown enough to earn a longer contract before someone else does. Equally whoever recommended signing Rimmington clearly hadn't done their homework.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Tue Jun 26, 2018 10:16 amby captaincolly
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:297/5 at the close. Only positive is the slow rate of scoring but 5 wickets is a poor return. Can't see how this attack will ever bowl a good side out cheaply unless conditions are in their favour.
Slow pitch so you need to be patient!_- that's us knackered.
Reckon Salisbury has shown enough to earn a longer contract before someone else does. Equally whoever recommended signing Rimmington clearly hadn't done their homework.
I agree, Salisbury has been very impressive. The Rimmington signing was a strange one, he might surprise us and be great in the T20's but I doubt it! He's almost totally ineffective in FC cricket as a bowler though on what we've seen so far.
Re: Durham Match Thread 2018
Posted:
Tue Jun 26, 2018 2:19 pmby captaincolly
50 partnership between Trott and Barker ( who was dropped on 0 ) and they seem to be scoring more quickly now.
Extras mounting up too - 22 so far.