Page 148 of 197

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 7:54 pm
by Durhamfootman
captaincolly wrote:
Durhamfootman wrote:how long is Rimmer signed for? His runs total and his batting ave for us is the same as Gareth Harte has managed.... and he takes more wickets

the Weighell has 185 runs in 5 knocks

get everyone fit and firing for next year and we could have plenty of runs in us right down to 9

Think it's 2 years for Rimmo. McCarthy and Potts are also handy with the bat.

pity they aren't handy with the ball too

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 7:54 pm
by Durhamfootman
although I'm being harsh, really

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 7:55 pm
by Durhamfootman
Durhamfootman wrote:One of the reasons why we struggle is that we do not have a settled line up... and I include bowlers in that.

So far this season, we have fielded 13 players who have featured in 3 or less of the 9 matches and only Rushy, Smith, Steel and Clark have featured in 7 of the 9, so we go into each match with a few players who have been parachuted into the side, presumably to fill holes, and if we don't address this, then we will sit in the middle or at the bottom of div 2 for years to come

at last, though, it does look as though we are starting to try and tackle it. As well as the openers, Salisbury looks a good signing

just need to try and get that Dixon fella signed up for next year :coat

just kidding about Dixon....... should concentrate on his electrical retail business

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:02 pm
by captaincolly
Durhamfootman wrote:
captaincolly wrote:
Durhamfootman wrote:how long is Rimmer signed for? His runs total and his batting ave for us is the same as Gareth Harte has managed.... and he takes more wickets

the Weighell has 185 runs in 5 knocks

get everyone fit and firing for next year and we could have plenty of runs in us right down to 9

Think it's 2 years for Rimmo. McCarthy and Potts are also handy with the bat.

pity they aren't handy with the ball too

:lol:
Durhamfootman wrote:
Durhamfootman wrote:One of the reasons why we struggle is that we do not have a settled line up... and I include bowlers in that.

So far this season, we have fielded 13 players who have featured in 3 or less of the 9 matches and only Rushy, Smith, Steel and Clark have featured in 7 of the 9, so we go into each match with a few players who have been parachuted into the side, presumably to fill holes, and if we don't address this, then we will sit in the middle or at the bottom of div 2 for years to come

at last, though, it does look as though we are starting to try and tackle it. As well as the openers, Salisbury looks a good signing

just need to try and get that Dixon fella signed up for next year :coat

just kidding about Dixon....... should concentrate on his electrical retail business

I'd forgotten about Dixon!
Yes, we do seem to be more proactive. Lees said he had several other offers but instinctively chose us - he was never going to say otherwise but I suspect he's telling the truth because it'd be a surprise if someone of his ability doesn't come good.
Salisbury a revelation, either we got lucky or someone made a shrewd choice.

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:05 pm
by Durhamfootman
wasn't Salisbury an MCC young cricketer?

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:11 pm
by captaincolly
Durhamfootman wrote:wasn't Salisbury an MCC young cricketer?

I think so. He was also with Hampshire. Think Brendy said he started off very well for them but didn't build on the start.
I see Rocky failed again for Sorry.

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:13 pm
by Durhamfootman
ah, that's a shame

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:14 pm
by Durhamfootman
I hadn't realised that Salisbury had been with Hants. Essex I knew about.. at the very start of his career

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:18 pm
by captaincolly
Durhamfootman wrote:I hadn't realised that Salisbury had been with Hants. Essex I knew about.. at the very start of his career

I'd forgotten he was at Essex.

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:19 pm
by Durhamfootman
put us together and our memory/knowledge would be unsurpassed

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:22 pm
by captaincolly
Durhamfootman wrote:put us together and our memory/knowledge would be unsurpassed

:lol:

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:31 pm
by Durhamfootman
pity that we can only play this lot once

I was going to say that I hate the lottery of not playing everyone twice, but at least we won't have to be blown away by the returning Matt Henry for Kent

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:35 pm
by captaincolly
Durhamfootman wrote:pity that we can only play this lot once

I was going to say that I hate the lottery of not playing everyone twice, but at least we won't have to be blown away by the returning Matt Henry for Kent

That's one bit of good luck.

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:09 pm
by westoelad
Dixon has changed it's product which is what the cricketer should do.
Where does Will Smith fit in next year? Obviously Colly needs to go so how about

Sandpaper
Lees
Steel
Smith
Clark
Harte
Poytner
Wood
McCarthy
Salisbury
Rush.

Re: Durham Match Thread 2018

PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:30 pm
by captaincolly
westoelad wrote:Dixon has changed it's product which is what the cricketer should do.
Where does Will Smith fit in next year? Obviously Colly needs to go so how about

Sandpaper
Lees
Steel
Smith
Clark
Harte
Poytner
Wood
McCarthy
Salisbury
Rush.

:lol:
That looks like a useful side - Weighell/Potts in the mix when Wood is either injured or away with England and if Carse ever recovers he'd be an option. All of those bowlers are injury prone but hopefully between them they can make an impression.