Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

Arthur Crabtree wrote:Good comeback for Yorks. Still playing as well.

Do we still have points reductions for 18 wickets in a day.

19 wickets now. I think the regulations changed so it's up to the umpires whether or not to have a pitch enquiry rather than the old regulation where a certain number of wickets triggered an automatic inspection. I could well be wrong about that though!

Superb turnaround by Yorkshire, i'm more pleased with Ben Coad taking wickets in the middle order if anything.

Easier said than done, but just need to knuckle down tomorrow and bat for as much of Day 2 as possible.

captaincolly wrote:

Arthur Crabtree wrote:Good comeback for Yorks. Still playing as well.

Do we still have points reductions for 18 wickets in a day.

19 wickets now.

Livingstone not batting, so all out. Wickets shared around for the Yorks seamers.

Arthur Crabtree wrote:

captaincolly wrote:

Arthur Crabtree wrote:Good comeback for Yorks. Still playing as well.

Do we still have points reductions for 18 wickets in a day.

19 wickets now.

Livingstone not batting, so all out. Wickets shared around for the Yorks seamers.

Fractured thumb. That'll probably rule him out for a while.

Yorkshire are 33-1 and Root and KW out for 3 and 1.

250 lead would be nice. But a long way off.

Only two wickets in the game so far for Anderson, surprising given it's a bowlers' pitch.

All over in 2 days?

I'm siding with Yorkshire mainly on games played.

Century from Alex Wakeley. Needs to keep it going.

DiligentDefence wrote:Century from Alex Wakeley. Needs to keep it going.

Shouldn't have said that.

Glamorgan 17-5 against Sussex. Archer has 4 wickets in 4 overs including Khawaja for 0.

hard to see any way back for Glamorgan from here

headline may be Lancs fighting back, but Yorks have far too many runs already in this game and in (presumably) these conditions. Everybody is nicking off, so the ball must be doing just enough

Durhamfootman wrote:headline may be Lancs fighting back, but Yorks have far too many runs already in this game and in (presumably) these conditions. Everybody is nicking off, so the ball must be doing just enough

Lancs also without Livingstone - broken thumb & out of action for a while.

And Yorks now well ahead, as long as the pitch hasn't gone into a coma.

captaincolly wrote:

Durhamfootman wrote:headline may be Lancs fighting back, but Yorks have far too many runs already in this game and in (presumably) these conditions. Everybody is nicking off, so the ball must be doing just enough

Lancs also without Livingstone - broken thumb & out of action for a while.

Not a broken wrist?

Arthur Crabtree wrote:

captaincolly wrote:

Durhamfootman wrote:headline may be Lancs fighting back, but Yorks have far too many runs already in this game and in (presumably) these conditions. Everybody is nicking off, so the ball must be doing just enough

Lancs also without Livingstone - broken thumb & out of action for a while.

Not a broken wrist?

I think when he went off the feeling was he'd hurt his wrist but Lancs later said it's a fractured left thumb.