100 ball Cricket

county and domestic cricket around the world

Re: Random Cricket Thread (Domestic Cricket)

Postby Durhamfootman » Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:48 pm

I don't mind innovation of this sort, tbh. It won't be able to compete with the IPL if the format remains the same, but it might in a new format. The acid test of success (apart from the money that sponsors are prepared to cough up) might be whether the IPL adopts the format...... that would be a coup
2017 Open Golf FL
2016 Australia-SouthAfrica test FL
2016 County Championship D1 FL
2016 Indian Premier League FL
2015 County Fantasy Manager
2015 Big Bash League FL
2014 WI-England test and ODI FL
2014 County Championship D2 FL
2013 County Championship D2 FL
2012 Twenty20 Cup FL
Durhamfootman
 
Posts: 34578
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:53 pm
Location: Chester-le-Street
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC

Re: Random Cricket Thread (Domestic Cricket)

Postby Alviro Patterson » Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:54 pm

captaincolly wrote:A pertinent question by someone on Twitter - Won't the changes potentially play havoc with the DL system?


Or even working out a bowlers economy rate, as it is based on runs per 6 ball over.
In Phil Parkinson we trust
"You won't get anywhere slouching about half out of bed"
"They took all our players away, banned our captain and we still came away with a ten-wicket victory"

2011-12 Oz vs India Tests FL guru | 2012-13 Oz vs SA Tests FL guru | 2012-13 Bang vs WI combined FL guru | 2013 Friends Life T20 FL guru | 2015 The Ashes FL guru | 2015 County Championship D2 FL guru | 2016 Womens WT20 FL guru| 2016 Eng v Pak Tests FL guru | 2017 Kia Super League FL guru
User avatar
Alviro Patterson
 
Posts: 16527
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:07 pm
Location: Loiner City Region
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire CCC, Bradford City FC

Re: Random Cricket Thread (Domestic Cricket)

Postby captaincolly » Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:05 pm

Alviro Patterson wrote:
captaincolly wrote:A pertinent question by someone on Twitter - Won't the changes potentially play havoc with the DL system?


Or even working out a bowlers economy rate, as it is based on runs per 6 ball over.

Yep!
captaincolly
 
Posts: 24449
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby mikesiva » Fri Apr 20, 2018 6:49 am

I thought this deserves its own thread.

I believe the BBC will have the rights to this.
Nobody has a stance quite like the mighty Shivnarine....

Australia-New Zealand ODI's Prediction Guru
2009 spring chess league guru
Pakistan vs Australia ODI's Prediction Guru
World 20/20 Prediction Guru
2010-2011 final places Premiership footy prediction guru
2011 French Open tennis prediction guru
2011 Bang vs WI combined fantasy guru
2012 Caribbean T20 fantasy guru
2012 Euros prediction guru
2012-2013 final places Premiership footy prediction guru
2013 Champions League prediction guru
2013 chess mini-tournament guru
2014 Eng-SL combined fantasy guru
2014 chess mini-tournament guru
2017 Australian Open tennis guru
User avatar
mikesiva
 
Posts: 34840
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:41 pm
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Team(s) Supported: First - West Indies
Joint Second - England, Sri Lanka

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby Durhamfootman » Fri Apr 20, 2018 5:44 pm

of course, the rationale behind the 100 balls is to finish the game in 3 hours, yet when T20 first appeared the games were always finished within 3 hours..... the final over had to have been started 75 mins into an innings with a short turnaround in between (back then players ran off the pitch when they were out and the incoming batsmen ran on, to avoid 6 run penalties for starting that final over late), so if T20 has become too long, then it is entirely the fault of the administrators for allowing it to happen in the first place
2017 Open Golf FL
2016 Australia-SouthAfrica test FL
2016 County Championship D1 FL
2016 Indian Premier League FL
2015 County Fantasy Manager
2015 Big Bash League FL
2014 WI-England test and ODI FL
2014 County Championship D2 FL
2013 County Championship D2 FL
2012 Twenty20 Cup FL
Durhamfootman
 
Posts: 34578
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:53 pm
Location: Chester-le-Street
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby andy » Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:37 pm

This idea is complete crap, i can't believe its actually going to happen!
2012 - ENG vs SA ODI series winner
2013 - US Open golf winner, WI vs PAK winner , ENG vs OZ ODI and T20 winner
2015- Open golf championship winner
2017 - OZ vs Pak odi'S, AUS vs NZ ODI, NZ vs SA Tests , WI vs PAK tests
2018 - NZ vs Pak t20 FL winner2018 - SA vs Ind test match fl winner US open golf FL [color=#0000FF] - [color=#FF0000]Open golf FL winner



Essex CCC county champions
andy
 
Posts: 17397
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:25 pm
Location: Essex
Team(s) Supported: Essex CCC
West ham united
Sunrisers Hyderberad
England

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby Durhamfootman » Sat Apr 21, 2018 8:06 pm

is it definitely decided?
2017 Open Golf FL
2016 Australia-SouthAfrica test FL
2016 County Championship D1 FL
2016 Indian Premier League FL
2015 County Fantasy Manager
2015 Big Bash League FL
2014 WI-England test and ODI FL
2014 County Championship D2 FL
2013 County Championship D2 FL
2012 Twenty20 Cup FL
Durhamfootman
 
Posts: 34578
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:53 pm
Location: Chester-le-Street
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby Arthur Crabtree » Sun Apr 22, 2018 12:00 am

Not yet.
2012-13 SL vs NZ combined fantasy guru

I always say that everybody's right.
User avatar
Arthur Crabtree
 
Posts: 57646
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Nottingham
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire/New England.

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby captaincolly » Mon Apr 23, 2018 2:51 pm

Apparently they're now considering allowing 3 different bowlers to bowl the 10 ball over so a captain could replace someone mid-over who is getting smashed around. According to The Telegraph the ECB may decide against it not because it's a ridiculous idea but because changing bowlers mid-over could slow the over rate down when the idea of a 16 over game is to reduce the playing time!
captaincolly
 
Posts: 24449
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: Random Cricket Thread (Domestic Cricket)

Postby GarlicJam » Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:46 pm

captaincolly wrote:

According to The Times it will be a single 10 ball over that can be bowled at any stage during the innings.
The new tournament is scheduled to begin in the summer of 2020 and will have innings made up of 15 traditional six-ball overs and one ten-ball over that could be bowled at any point. The proposed idea would result in matches being completed about 40 minutes faster than T20 matches, which, if they go the distance, last 40 balls longer.
[/quote]
It is ironic - or is it? - that in 2020, the ECB will be working doing away with 2020 cricket.
Maybe




I think I won something, sometime
User avatar
GarlicJam
 
Posts: 9327
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: Launceston, Tasmania
Team(s) Supported: Australia, Tasmania, New South Wales, Carlton Blues, Sharkies, The Toon.

Re: Random Cricket Thread (Domestic Cricket)

Postby captaincolly » Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:31 pm

GarlicJam wrote:
captaincolly wrote:

According to The Times it will be a single 10 ball over that can be bowled at any stage during the innings.
The new tournament is scheduled to begin in the summer of 2020 and will have innings made up of 15 traditional six-ball overs and one ten-ball over that could be bowled at any point. The proposed idea would result in matches being completed about 40 minutes faster than T20 matches, which, if they go the distance, last 40 balls longer.

It is ironic - or is it? - that in 2020, the ECB will be working doing away with 2020 cricket.[/quote]
That would be funny! And quite likely given its the ECB we are dealing with.
captaincolly
 
Posts: 24449
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:47 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, England

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby Durhamfootman » Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:58 pm

even the bank of England has spotted the symmetry and is introducing new 20's in 2020

perhaps Mark Carney will have to think about the introduction of a £100 note instead?
2017 Open Golf FL
2016 Australia-SouthAfrica test FL
2016 County Championship D1 FL
2016 Indian Premier League FL
2015 County Fantasy Manager
2015 Big Bash League FL
2014 WI-England test and ODI FL
2014 County Championship D2 FL
2013 County Championship D2 FL
2012 Twenty20 Cup FL
Durhamfootman
 
Posts: 34578
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:53 pm
Location: Chester-le-Street
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby Arthur Crabtree » Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:49 pm

Durham’s PCA representative, Chris Rushworth, tweeted: “What a load of *******.”


https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/ ... torunament
2012-13 SL vs NZ combined fantasy guru

I always say that everybody's right.
User avatar
Arthur Crabtree
 
Posts: 57646
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Nottingham
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire/New England.

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby GarlicJam » Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:36 pm

Durhamfootman wrote:of course, the rationale behind the 100 balls is to finish the game in 3 hours, yet when T20 first appeared the games were always finished within 3 hours..... the final over had to have been started 75 mins into an innings with a short turnaround in between (back then players ran off the pitch when they were out and the incoming batsmen ran on, to avoid 6 run penalties for starting that final over late), so if T20 has become too long, then it is entirely the fault of the administrators for allowing it to happen in the first place

I was considering this while watching some of the BBL this season past. Besides the rest of the batting team being in the "dugout" on the boundary line, and the next couple of batters being padded up, all speed-up changes have gone put the window.

The last over takes up to ten minutes to deliver as it is, imagine if it becomes a ten ball last 'over' that up to three bowlers can deliver - that could take half an hour.
Maybe




I think I won something, sometime
User avatar
GarlicJam
 
Posts: 9327
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:52 pm
Location: Launceston, Tasmania
Team(s) Supported: Australia, Tasmania, New South Wales, Carlton Blues, Sharkies, The Toon.

Re: 100 ball Cricket

Postby Alviro Patterson » Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:38 pm

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/43854924

Interesting to say Andrew Strauss wants to target kids and their mums for this 100 ball competition.

One would think evening starts are inappropriate for this target audience because the kids and hard working fathers will be wanting their tea. Dirt cheap tickets might be one idea to attract an crowd, but how much will it costs to eat at the venues? The extra costs do add up significantly, especially when some venues are not conveniently located.

Either matches will start at 12noon (not ideal for TV) or 7.45pm (not ideal for families). This 100 ball proposal is becoming very desperate by the powers above.
In Phil Parkinson we trust
"You won't get anywhere slouching about half out of bed"
"They took all our players away, banned our captain and we still came away with a ten-wicket victory"

2011-12 Oz vs India Tests FL guru | 2012-13 Oz vs SA Tests FL guru | 2012-13 Bang vs WI combined FL guru | 2013 Friends Life T20 FL guru | 2015 The Ashes FL guru | 2015 County Championship D2 FL guru | 2016 Womens WT20 FL guru| 2016 Eng v Pak Tests FL guru | 2017 Kia Super League FL guru
User avatar
Alviro Patterson
 
Posts: 16527
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:07 pm
Location: Loiner City Region
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire CCC, Bradford City FC

PreviousNext

Return to Domestic Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests