Arthur Crabtree wrote:That was against Durham though. High degree of difficulty.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Four down, but first innings lead will come in handy.
st_brendy wrote:captaincolly wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorkshire went from 187-1 to 250-8 before recovering a little to 327 all out. Still, runs on the board as they say.
Haseebwatch. 24 against Durham. He has that ton this season but hasn't gone past 50 otherwise.
Wonder if it's getting to the point where he needs to move on and make a new start? It seems to have worked for Alex Lees - although now I've said it Haseeb will probably get 200 in the second innings and Lees won't score any runs for the rest of the season.
He's more than welcome to try out a new start on the south coast. Weatherley-Soames is easily the worst opening pair since I've been following Hampshire. Both are a long, long, long way from being good enough.
It's a huge shame really, because our middle order is as good as it's been for a long time. If only they weren't always coming in at 10-2.
st_brendy wrote:st_brendy wrote:captaincolly wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Yorkshire went from 187-1 to 250-8 before recovering a little to 327 all out. Still, runs on the board as they say.
Haseebwatch. 24 against Durham. He has that ton this season but hasn't gone past 50 otherwise.
Wonder if it's getting to the point where he needs to move on and make a new start? It seems to have worked for Alex Lees - although now I've said it Haseeb will probably get 200 in the second innings and Lees won't score any runs for the rest of the season.
He's more than welcome to try out a new start on the south coast. Weatherley-Soames is easily the worst opening pair since I've been following Hampshire. Both are a long, long, long way from being good enough.
It's a huge shame really, because our middle order is as good as it's been for a long time. If only they weren't always coming in at 10-2.
As I was saying. Soames bags a pair on a flat wicket! And he was stone dead LBW even before he was later bowled.
DiligentDefence wrote:Sussex need 499 to win. Is it sad that I don't feel confident?
DiligentDefence wrote:DiligentDefence wrote:Sussex need 499 to win. Is it sad that I don't feel confident?
OK so I was slightly pessimistic. Good win.
andy wrote:Our season has gained momentum at the right time...looking like another innings win here, this time at Notts, who are having an abysmal season
st_brendy wrote:Notts v Essex is very much a case of two sides going in very different directions.
Still half a season for Notts to turn it around of course - and they do only need to move up one place to survive, rather than two - but the way things are going, it looks like they'll surely have one of the best and most expensively squads ever to be relegated.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests