Aidan11 wrote:Robert wrote:Aidan11 wrote:I don't buy the team unity thing.
Andy Cole & Teddy Sheringham didn't like each other at Man Utd. They still won loads of silverware. I have found that even in normal employment there will always be someone who doesn't get along with another, but as long as it doesn't get personal, there's no reason why they can't work in the same workplace in a professional manner.
If a manager is prepared to handle "awkward" team members, then fine. But he is under no obligation to do so - if he wants to rid himself of the distraction, then that is his right.
It is, but KP is a box office draw. One of our top players (who else can boast three test double centuries?). A case of cutting off the nose to spite the face.
shankybiggestengfan wrote:So KP doesnt get along with a few team members but he still performs? And the team members with whom he doesnt get along are not performing. So maybe those team members need to re- consider their professionalism. If KP can still perform, why cant they? It is not KP who is the problem clearly...
hopeforthebest wrote:Alec Ferguson would have him on the transfer list in double quick time.
sportbloggeradi wrote:Aidan11 wrote:Robert wrote:Aidan11 wrote:I don't buy the team unity thing.
Andy Cole & Teddy Sheringham didn't like each other at Man Utd. They still won loads of silverware. I have found that even in normal employment there will always be someone who doesn't get along with another, but as long as it doesn't get personal, there's no reason why they can't work in the same workplace in a professional manner.
If a manager is prepared to handle "awkward" team members, then fine. But he is under no obligation to do so - if he wants to rid himself of the distraction, then that is his right.
It is, but KP is a box office draw. One of our top players (who else can boast three test double centuries?). A case of cutting off the nose to spite the face.
Cook IMO
Dilbert wrote:So what Swann said (doubted KPs captaincy qualities), when both of them are teammates, still playing basically shows that he doesnt consider KP too highly.
Similarly, KP texts some unflattering things about Strauss, when both of them are teammates, still playing together.
Dont see the difference basically.
Or should he have said - "Strauss is a poor captain, out of form batsman but a great bloke to go out for a drink with"
Its the truth after all... and he would have said something good about him...
And what about Samit Patel? Its ok to say those things about him?
hopeforthebest wrote:Alec Ferguson would have him on the transfer list in double quick time.
Dilbert wrote:So what Swann said (doubted KPs captaincy qualities), when both of them are teammates, still playing basically shows that he doesnt consider KP too highly.
Similarly, KP texts some unflattering things about Strauss, when both of them are teammates, still playing together.
Dont see the difference basically.
Or should he have said - "Strauss is a poor captain, out of form batsman but a great bloke to go out for a drink with"
Its the truth after all... and he would have said something good about him...
And what about Samit Patel? Its ok to say those things about him?

Iamthewalrus wrote:Dilbert
So, in your opinion, KP and Swann both deserved to have been dropped?
sportbloggeradi wrote:Dilbert wrote:What I would like to understand from people who think it was right for KP to be dropped to ensure team unity etc, do you think Swanns comments in his bio were justified? Should he have been dropped too?
Maybe Yes, if he too has not followed team ethics.
But unlike Swann, KP had many issues. First with Moores, then with IPL contract, now with Flower and Strauss.
He used retirement from short format as gamble. When it foiled he did an Afridi. Then he sends sms during important series revealing the rifts within team to his opponents in middle of important tour. It's just not about one issue.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests