by meninblue » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:38 am
Alviro Patterson wrote:Affording Kevin Pietersen isn't the issue for Surrey, they are probably the richest county in addition to having some wealthy benefactors.
As mentioned in the topic, counties are restricted to a salary cap of £2 Million per year. Considering Surrey have Graeme Smith on the books as well as some county stalwarts (Davies, Meaker) they would do well not to breach the cap.
The television rights are basically in one package (England, England womens, England u19s, Counties, Club T20 Finals Day) Really the domestic game should have it's own seperate TV rights, especially how popular Twenty20 is.
As the salary/finance is not an issue for Surrey, who knows they might provide the money over salary cap via other means.
Yes, the County should have its broadcast rights.Any cricket tournament of major cricketing nation nowadays is watched worldwide.I have seen Pro40 and FLT20 in my country,but not all matches are broadcasted.Probably only few LVCC matches are broadcasted afaik.Once they fetch broadcast rights for all matches, the source of income increases further by boundary line advertisement boards, the scorecards with name of some company,more money fetched by cricketers wearing sponsors clothes and few more logos on clothes will mean more revenue etc etc.
Test FL's - 8 , ODI and Tests Combo FL's - 1, ODI World Cup - 1, ODI FL's - 7, ODI and T20i combo FL's - 1 ,
T20 Franchisee FL's - 7, T20i Cup FL's- 1, T20 FL's- 5 , 50 Overs Domestic FL's - 1, 40 Overs Domestic FL's- 1