Durhamfootman wrote:I'll keep my fingers crossed. he's a terrific county stalwart
The ICC issued a statement expressing their disappointment at the outcome – in which only Ashraful, one of the Gladiators' owners and another unnamed player have been found guilty, with the other six cleared – and reserving their right to appeal.
captaincolly wrote:Am I missing something obvious here?The ICC issued a statement expressing their disappointment at the outcome – in which only Ashraful, one of the Gladiators' owners and another unnamed player have been found guilty, with the other six cleared – and reserving their right to appeal.
Why are the ICC complaining? Seems a very poor response to me.
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/f ... nvolvement
England's_No7 wrote:captaincolly wrote:Am I missing something obvious here?The ICC issued a statement expressing their disappointment at the outcome – in which only Ashraful, one of the Gladiators' owners and another unnamed player have been found guilty, with the other six cleared – and reserving their right to appeal.
Why are the ICC complaining? Seems a very poor response to me.
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/f ... nvolvement
That confused me as well. Surely they should be pleased that they've caught the right people...
Durhamfootman wrote:England's_No7 wrote:captaincolly wrote:Am I missing something obvious here?The ICC issued a statement expressing their disappointment at the outcome – in which only Ashraful, one of the Gladiators' owners and another unnamed player have been found guilty, with the other six cleared – and reserving their right to appeal.
Why are the ICC complaining? Seems a very poor response to me.
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/f ... nvolvement
That confused me as well. Surely they should be pleased that they've caught the right people...
unless they were hoping for really, really big ripples to deter other cricketers in the future. Why should a small detail like innocence be allowed to get in the way of making a really big point?
Making_Splinters wrote:I'd guess that there was a lot of evidence against some players, just not quite concrete enough to secure a conviction.
dan08 wrote:Robbie Joseph has played in all of the warm ups so far. I think he's on trial.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests