Aidan11 wrote:I think I heard somewhere that around page 333 KP writes There probably should have been more cricket here.
He didn't say that when he was playing for England.
Aidan11 wrote:I think I heard somewhere that around page 333 KP writes There probably should have been more cricket here.
Making_Splinters wrote:Smith's view on the England side is rather interesting, especially considering what went on on their last tour.
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/oct/09/graeme-smith-kevin-pietersen-england-bullying
Aidan11 wrote:I wonder how KP feels about Abba being played in the dressing room.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:
They were not regarded as trouble makers as far as I know. But there you again using the 'comparisons of form when the subject is Pietersen. I should point out that at the end of the ashes series before he resigned, Flower said every player would be required to play CC cricket to prove their worth. Cook scored 386 runs in 3 games with 2 centuries, Bell 506 runs in 4 games with 2 centuries, both Prior and Trott well incapacitated. So the return of Cook and Bell was confirmed by their county form.
Exactly. KP was seen as a trouble maker, which was why he was sacked. It wasn't about runs. And KP wasn't given the option of scoring runs at the start of the season. He was told the team was moving on without him.
Aidan11 wrote:I wonder how KP feels about Abba being played in the dressing room.
hopeforthebest wrote:Deviation alert!!!!
He was probably sacked because they could afford to miss him whereas those non trouble makers were given the opportunity to prove their worth in the CC. If KP was not seen as trouble maker no doubt he would have been given the same opportunity. That was the point I was making, non trouble makers without runs ( Bell did get 3 centuies in 2013 to KP's one though) versus KP's record as trouble maker without runs.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:I stabbed KP last?
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests