The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

What's buzzing in the world of cricket....

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Arthur Crabtree » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:22 pm

Maybe there's some of that. I think he did it at the behest of Flower, as part of the plan, 'going forward'.
I always say that everybody's right.
User avatar
Arthur Crabtree
 
Posts: 87536
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Nottingham
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire.

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Arthur Crabtree » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:24 pm

Partly for one of the reasons stated, that Cook would feel vulnerable (Andy thinking he wouldn't be there to take charge). As well as the disengaged stuff. Which feels more and more ridiculous as time passes.
I always say that everybody's right.
User avatar
Arthur Crabtree
 
Posts: 87536
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Nottingham
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire.

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Making_Splinters » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:45 pm

As with everything that goes on around KP, there's a grain of truth buried in a mountain of manure.

This isn't the first time Broad has spoken out against the decision to remove KP, but this time it raised an interesting point. Why wasn't KP just dropped?
"It was my opinion it is up to me if I want to justify it or not" - Bhaveshgor
User avatar
Making_Splinters
 
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:44 pm
Location: Manchester, England
Team(s) Supported: Cricket - Lancshire , England
Rugby - Sale , England

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby sussexpob » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:47 pm

Making_Splinters wrote:Why wasn't KP just dropped?



Because dropping him would have led to exactly the same questions and answers, MS.
2010 French Open fantasy league guru 2010 Wimbledon fantasy league guru 2014 Masters golf fantasy guru 2015 Players Championship FL Guru 2016 Masters Golf Fantasy Guru

And a hat and bra to you too, my good sirs!
sussexpob
 
Posts: 39096
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:14 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Team(s) Supported: Sussex and England Cricket, Vålerenga Fotball/FC Barcelona/Seagulls! ....
England and Norway at everything else

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Making_Splinters » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:49 pm

sussexpob wrote:
Making_Splinters wrote:Why wasn't KP just dropped?



Because dropping him would have led to exactly the same questions and answers, MS.


Dropping a player isn't unheard of, if anything it's relatively common. Forcibly retiring a player, saying they'll never be selected again is the exact opposite. It's grandstanding, gloating, goading.
"It was my opinion it is up to me if I want to justify it or not" - Bhaveshgor
User avatar
Making_Splinters
 
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:44 pm
Location: Manchester, England
Team(s) Supported: Cricket - Lancshire , England
Rugby - Sale , England

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Aidan11 » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:50 pm

If he was dropped and made stacks of runs at county level, then the press would be asking why he isn't getting picked.
2010 Ind v Oz fantasy league
2011-12 internal Prem footy prediction league
2012 US Open Golf Prediction league
2012 Eng vs WI ODIs fantasy league
2012 TV Cup Winner
2012 CC Final Placings Prediction league
2014 Eng v India Test FL
2014 Royal London One Day Cup FL
2014 Ryder Cup FL
2015 Ashes Test FL
2015 County Championship Division 1 FL
2016 SA v Eng Test FL
2016 Eng v SL Test FL
2016 Eng v SL ODI FL
2022 County Championship Div 2 FL
2023 County Championship Div 2 FL
User avatar
Aidan11
 
Posts: 48590
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:38 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, Hartlepool United

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby sussexpob » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:52 pm

Making_Splinters wrote:
sussexpob wrote:
Making_Splinters wrote:Why wasn't KP just dropped?


Because dropping him would have led to exactly the same questions and answers, MS.


Dropping a player isn't unheard of, if anything it's relatively common. Forcibly retiring a player, saying they'll never be selected again is the exact opposite. It's grandstanding, gloating, goading.


KP was Englands best player on paper, had he been dropped when 5 other batsman had failed worse than he did, the question about him being singled out and used an example would have led to the same conclusions.

If you think KP could have just been dropped without any hint of reaction from fans, him or certain members of the squad, then I think you are being a tad naive.
2010 French Open fantasy league guru 2010 Wimbledon fantasy league guru 2014 Masters golf fantasy guru 2015 Players Championship FL Guru 2016 Masters Golf Fantasy Guru

And a hat and bra to you too, my good sirs!
sussexpob
 
Posts: 39096
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:14 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Team(s) Supported: Sussex and England Cricket, Vålerenga Fotball/FC Barcelona/Seagulls! ....
England and Norway at everything else

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Aidan11 » Sun Jan 11, 2015 6:55 pm

I've still yet to know what Downton does apart from firing England's top player.
2010 Ind v Oz fantasy league
2011-12 internal Prem footy prediction league
2012 US Open Golf Prediction league
2012 Eng vs WI ODIs fantasy league
2012 TV Cup Winner
2012 CC Final Placings Prediction league
2014 Eng v India Test FL
2014 Royal London One Day Cup FL
2014 Ryder Cup FL
2015 Ashes Test FL
2015 County Championship Division 1 FL
2016 SA v Eng Test FL
2016 Eng v SL Test FL
2016 Eng v SL ODI FL
2022 County Championship Div 2 FL
2023 County Championship Div 2 FL
User avatar
Aidan11
 
Posts: 48590
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:38 pm
Team(s) Supported: Durham CCC, Hartlepool United

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Arthur Crabtree » Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:26 pm

Smooths over public relations.
I always say that everybody's right.
User avatar
Arthur Crabtree
 
Posts: 87536
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Nottingham
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire.

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby alfie » Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:41 pm

Dilbert wrote:I think what Broad implied was that they should have handled the incident in a more politically "correct" way. Don't think he is saying KP shouldn't have been sacked, he is just saying they could have just asked him to go back to his county and then make excuses for not picking him up again. Result is the same, but without the repercussions that are currently happening. A slow death, make him sweat, keep him quiet for a longer time. People wouldn't have been so interested in his version if he was away from the limelight for 2 years...
He'll do well as a politician - Broad.


Obviously I don't know what was in Broad's mind ; but the above seems plausible. Similar thoughts occurred to me at the time , though I can see that method would also have had its drawbacks , as others have pointed out.
Despite what some Pietersen fans might wish to believe , it doesn't read as a ringing endorsement of the "KP was robbed" theory...
alfie
 
Posts: 7830
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:26 am

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Arthur Crabtree » Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:54 pm

I (for one) didn't suggest that. I saw it more for what it implied about Downton.
I always say that everybody's right.
User avatar
Arthur Crabtree
 
Posts: 87536
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 12:52 pm
Location: Nottingham
Team(s) Supported: Yorkshire.

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Making_Splinters » Sun Jan 11, 2015 8:02 pm

sussexpob wrote:
Making_Splinters wrote:
sussexpob wrote:
Making_Splinters wrote:Why wasn't KP just dropped?


Because dropping him would have led to exactly the same questions and answers, MS.


Dropping a player isn't unheard of, if anything it's relatively common. Forcibly retiring a player, saying they'll never be selected again is the exact opposite. It's grandstanding, gloating, goading.


KP was Englands best player on paper, had he been dropped when 5 other batsman had failed worse than he did, the question about him being singled out and used an example would have led to the same conclusions.

If you think KP could have just been dropped without any hint of reaction from fans, him or certain members of the squad, then I think you are being a tad naive.


There have been controversial droppings in the past. England essentially wanted KP out of the team, there was no reason why they couldn't just drop him and move on. The path they chose was designed to humiliate.
"It was my opinion it is up to me if I want to justify it or not" - Bhaveshgor
User avatar
Making_Splinters
 
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:44 pm
Location: Manchester, England
Team(s) Supported: Cricket - Lancshire , England
Rugby - Sale , England

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby Making_Splinters » Sun Jan 11, 2015 8:03 pm

alfie wrote:
Dilbert wrote:I think what Broad implied was that they should have handled the incident in a more politically "correct" way. Don't think he is saying KP shouldn't have been sacked, he is just saying they could have just asked him to go back to his county and then make excuses for not picking him up again. Result is the same, but without the repercussions that are currently happening. A slow death, make him sweat, keep him quiet for a longer time. People wouldn't have been so interested in his version if he was away from the limelight for 2 years...
He'll do well as a politician - Broad.


Obviously I don't know what was in Broad's mind ; but the above seems plausible. Similar thoughts occurred to me at the time , though I can see that method would also have had its drawbacks , as others have pointed out.
Despite what some Pietersen fans might wish to believe , it doesn't read as a ringing endorsement of the "KP was robbed" theory...


Broad was very careful to make sure he didn't say KP should be playing for England, unlike he has done in the past. The point he made was about the methods used, which is fairly refreshing.
"It was my opinion it is up to me if I want to justify it or not" - Bhaveshgor
User avatar
Making_Splinters
 
Posts: 10183
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:44 pm
Location: Manchester, England
Team(s) Supported: Cricket - Lancshire , England
Rugby - Sale , England

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby backfootpunch » Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:10 pm

Making_Splinters wrote:
alfie wrote:
Dilbert wrote:I think what Broad implied was that they should have handled the incident in a more politically "correct" way. Don't think he is saying KP shouldn't have been sacked, he is just saying they could have just asked him to go back to his county and then make excuses for not picking him up again. Result is the same, but without the repercussions that are currently happening. A slow death, make him sweat, keep him quiet for a longer time. People wouldn't have been so interested in his version if he was away from the limelight for 2 years...
He'll do well as a politician - Broad.


Obviously I don't know what was in Broad's mind ; but the above seems plausible. Similar thoughts occurred to me at the time , though I can see that method would also have had its drawbacks , as others have pointed out.
Despite what some Pietersen fans might wish to believe , it doesn't read as a ringing endorsement of the "KP was robbed" theory...


Broad was very careful to make sure he didn't say KP should be playing for England, unlike he has done in the past. The point he made was about the methods used, which is fairly refreshing.


its difficult to disagree with anything that broad said

was actually nice to hear an england player who wasnt singing from the moores/cook company hymn sheet
2011 pak vs sl odi fantasy guru 2012 Pak vs SL test fantasy guru
2012 NZ vs SA test fantasy guru 2015 Australia vs NZ test fantasy guru
2012 masters golf fantasy guru 2015 New Zealand vs Sri Lanka combined fantasy guru
2011/12 premier league(external) fantasy guru
2012 Eng vs WI test fanstasy guru
euro 2012 (external) fantasy league guru

"I'll tell you what pressure is. Pressure is a Messerschmitt up your arse. Playing cricket is not."- Keith Miller
backfootpunch
 
Posts: 6198
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 5:25 pm
Team(s) Supported: england, warwickshire, birmingham city

Re: The enigma that is Kevin Pietersen

Postby alfie » Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:20 pm

Arthur Crabtree wrote:I (for one) didn't suggest that. I saw it more for what it implied about Downton.


Fair. I don't disagree. Downton (and his associates) certainly handled it clumsily , to say the least. But , also to be fair, whatever they did might have been seen as wrong , in some quarters. Not sure there was any way out of this one that would have kept everyone happy.

On the bright side , this thread may yet establish new records for longevity :)
alfie
 
Posts: 7830
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:26 am

PreviousNext

Return to International Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests