clubcricketeradi wrote:rich1uk wrote:clubcricketeradi wrote:Two new balls has definitely influenced ODI cricket. Pace bowlers are at advantage as ball stays new for long time. But reverse swing is delayed as a result. Spin bowlers are the worst affected because even if they are introduced in 25th over they have to bowl with a 12 overs old ball and that too with field restrictions. imo it has made teams think more abut team combinations, strategies etc . Many teams are still adjusting to all those changes.
I don't think it is as much of an advantage for the bowlers adi
the white ball doesn't seem to swing or seam as much as the red ball and having newer balls which stay harder for longer helps the batsmen just as much
Depends on whether batter likes pace or spin to bat against. And who bowlers are. Overall the technique has got more importance now for openers.
There are lot of changes in balls too with regards to lacquer user and layer, then how pronounced the seam of ball is. Now they have some degree of water proof balls to reduce dew factor as well as too much issue even if rains slightly.
all those factors are the same whether its one or two new balls tbh
having 2 new balls at the start isn't as much of a factor when it doesn't swing or seam much compared to losing out on the reverse swing and it being harder to hit the softer ball towards the end
how many times in tests do we hear commentators talking about the danger of taking the new ball against set batsmen as altho it might increase the chances of taking a wicket batsmen like the harder ball as they get full value for their shots


