st_brendy wrote:And then swipes his second ball straight to slip going for another.
SaintPowelly wrote:st_brendy wrote:And then swipes his second ball straight to slip going for another.
Idiotic, needed to support Briggs.
st_brendy wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:st_brendy wrote:And then swipes his second ball straight to slip going for another.
Idiotic, needed to support Briggs.
Nah. It's his way of playing. It's always been his way of playing. We knew it when we signed him, we knew it when he walked out to the crease. I'm completely fine with it.
It's for Tommo to support Briggs.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Should we be expecting alot of runs from Warwickshire's middle to lower order?
captaincolly wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Should we be expecting alot of runs from Warwickshire's middle to lower order?
Clarke, Barker and Patel are dangerous. Barker in particular has been a thorn in Durham's side over the years. All attacking players though so just as likely to get out cheaply as make big totals.
Good thing for Hampshire is you have such a big lead so it's not as if they'll have the option to take the game away unless something extraordinary happens.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 39 guests