
hopeforthebest wrote:This collapse can be put at the door of Mcmullan's foolish, wild innings.
Gingerfinch wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:This collapse can be put at the door of Mcmullan's foolish, wild innings.
Only caught about 20 minutes play earlier, which was 20 minutes of McCullum's knock. Not an innings of a number five, when his side were in a dominant position, and were looking to bat as long as possible.
SaintPowelly wrote:Gingerfinch wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:This collapse can be put at the door of Mcmullan's foolish, wild innings.
Only caught about 20 minutes play earlier, which was 20 minutes of McCullum's knock. Not an innings of a number five, when his side were in a dominant position, and were looking to bat as long as possible.
They weren't looking to bat as long as possible, they were looking to extend their lead and put pressure on the bowlers, and it worked.
Gingerfinch wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Gingerfinch wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:This collapse can be put at the door of Mcmullan's foolish, wild innings.
Only caught about 20 minutes play earlier, which was 20 minutes of McCullum's knock. Not an innings of a number five, when his side were in a dominant position, and were looking to bat as long as possible.
They weren't looking to bat as long as possible, they were looking to extend their lead and put pressure on the bowlers, and it worked.
Well they should have been looking to bat on. The fact they are still out there, suggests they want a big lead. The kiwi's won't want to be chasing too many on the last day.
The Waugh Twins wrote:Only the second time New Zealand have gone past 500 at Lords the previous was that memorable match back in 1973 which I don't remember.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:The Waugh Twins wrote:Only the second time New Zealand have gone past 500 at Lords the previous was that memorable match back in 1973 which I don't remember.
Were NZ playing test cricket back then?!
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests