sussexpob wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:Can groundsmen really produce pitches to order without making it so plain to see. Surely groundsmen at test venues must have some pride in producing a good pitch. When England were in India in 2012 there was similar talk that India would produce pitches that favoured them but an elderly groundsman said he would produce the pitch his way.
Ironically, the Indian board wanted the groundsman in question to stop producing the worst pitches known to man, because in the space of two or three tests, there had been 2 x 650, 1 x 550, and 3 x 450 plus scores on it.
Also, I think its pretty easy to deaden a pitch, probably the easiest of results to produce. Over time pitches accumulate dead plant matter (dead grass essentially) that forms a layer of thatch over the surface and deadens the pace in the pitch over time. This is a consequence of all pitches, and you should regularly use a shallow gouge to remove the top layer and reset it if the pitch is slow.... simply dont do that, and you have a pudding.
I mean its common to cover up bowlers foot marks by rolling in organic matter (which is not recommended if you want any kind of pace, but it does happen and is possible)... roll a load of dead plant for 12 days into the pitch and again its dead.
Its the only conclusion you can make because those designs not only slow the pitch but make it bind so it doesnt break up.. the only thing that makes sense in this situation, becuase if pitches are drying too quickly naturally, they break up