Aidan11 wrote:I hope Bell doesn't retire.
He still has a couple of good years left in him.
People shouldn't feel they are forced into going just because they reach a certain age.
Aidan11 wrote:I hope Bell doesn't retire.
He still has a couple of good years left in him.
People shouldn't feel they are forced into going just because they reach a certain age.
bhaveshgor wrote:
Sky currently pay 65M each year for English home games.
BT are paying 16M each year for Australia home games.
hopeforthebest wrote:The idea that Bell will retire seems highly improbable as he's oft repeated his desire to continue fighting for his place. Of course there are the usual suspects queuing up to help him on his way.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:The idea that Bell will retire seems highly improbable as he's oft repeated his desire to continue fighting for his place. Of course there are the usual suspects queuing up to help him on his way.
Who are they?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:The idea that Bell will retire seems highly improbable as he's oft repeated his desire to continue fighting for his place. Of course there are the usual suspects queuing up to help him on his way.
Who are they?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:
Sky currently pay 65M each year for English home games.
BT are paying 16M each year for Australia home games.
Feels like a lot for only one England tour, and probably a big series versus South Africa.
But if BT had all the cricket outside of the UK, it would be another good reason to get rid of Sky. I've not enjoyed their presentation at all this summer, and found it a too partial for my tastes. The commentators need a huge shake up, many are in a rut in terms of what they offer.
Aidan11 wrote:As if BT Sport aren't expensive enough they also charge a £15 activation fee.
What a rip-off.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests