GarlicJam wrote: Sure, to the muscle memory part, but the ball was not chucked at him, it would have missed him by 2 feet if he hadn't stuck out his arm, also not randomly as he was out of his crease, he should have expected it (all very quick, I give you), and it was heading directly for the stumps, AND it was from at least 10 yards away.
Considering that say a 150km/h bowler gives you 0.46 seconds to react from release to reaching a batsman, cutting this down by at least half when Starc releases the ball, and considering that the above reaction time is based on a 30-40% loss of pace on pitching, we are working with a 0.1 to 0.2 second estimated reaction time at most (as Starc doesnt not hit the pitch, and over a much shorter distance, the fastest pace will be maintained for longer).
The average human reaction time according to the lean sources available on the internet?? 0.215 seconds.
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime
So in short, before Stokes has even had time to develop a thought of "im getting hit" and to voluntarily react to it, the ball has hit him. Unless of course he is some form of god that helps him to develop thoughts and react to them 10 times quicker than others.
You can keep talking about this as a "Aussie vs Pommie" thing, but its simply applying scentific limitations to humans..... not expecting peoples mind to run as slowly as the single shot frames the umpire rather idiotically decided to base his decision on.
