Arthur Crabtree wrote:BD couldn't have thrown that away better if they'd tried.



Alviro Patterson wrote:Absolutely Footman. It's all good and well Brendon Julian saying Mahumudullah should have played it along the ground but it was a rank full toss, very close to above waist height and right on the batsmans eyeline. 9 times out of 10 in the modern game that is six all day long.
backfootpunch wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:backfootpunch wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:backfootpunch wrote:I meant to ask this earlier but what do people think of indias obvious tactic of producing raging turners for their games
Whilst every other game is played on a normal wicket
Not seen anything like this before from the home side in a major tournament
Sample size is too small to make this judgement yet considering the first game was played at nagpur which is always been slow and turning and the 2nd game which was affected by rain.
Also this is the first tournament played in vast extreme pitches.
You get the good pacy, small good batting wicket Mumbai, Banglore and should be Dharamasala and then the slow turners, tough to bat on Kolkata, Delhi and Nagpur.
With Mohali being in the middle.
But saying that if Banglore and Mohali start being slow and taking turn then yes the pitches have been doctored.
Banglore never really turned a huge amount and the wicket has always been great for batting and had good pace for the batsman to time the ball.
Mohali been slow lately since they haven't relaid the pitch for 20 years but even then the pitch doesn't really turn unless it has been doctored.
Anyway India is a huge country with varied wickets and with the tournament being played at 6 grounds at grounds at the north, east, south and west and middle of the country no surprise conditions vary between grounds.
So far the only pitch that has surprised me has been Dharamasala.
surely it cant be coincidence that the only two pitches in the tournament that have turned square have been in games featuring india, the rest of the games the ball hasnt really turned that much then it has ragged square in those two games
im surprised they even tried it again after it backfired on them against new zealand
Looks like you are right pitches have been doctored no way should banglore be this slow.
Exactly what I was thinking haha
It's an underhand tactic that isn't even working well
This is the sort of wicket that brings Bangladesh into the game
On a flat one india would win more often surely
backfootpunch wrote:I'm not so sure
That pitch offered much more turn and was much slower than the other games at that venue didn't it or am I confusing the grounds
backfootpunch wrote:I'm not so sure
That pitch offered much more turn and was much slower than the other games at that venue didn't it or am I confusing the grounds
Red Devil wrote:for some reason I did think BD would bottle it at some point, but with only a single needed to tie off 3 balls I thought my intuition may have been wrong!
awful performance from Ind though - batting was poor and the fielding was absolutely awful. Very lucky to still be in this.
Now we just have to beat Aus at the weekend!
Dhoni's keeping was excellent as the stumpings were taken on low bounce balls. The likes of Robin Uthappa, Dinesh would have got hit on pads or missed it for four. Credit to Dhoni for that as well as the timely bowling changes which worked this match at least. Shikhar has to score runs. Ajinkya can bat fast as we saw in his ODI innings in WC against likes of Steyn as well as he has an IPL hundred and many 50's.In addition to that he is slightly better fielder than Shikhar. We will have to give up on left - right opening combo if Shikhar fails another match or drop Yuvi if he too fails and make Shikhar bat in middle order. Yuvi anyways is not bowling in most matches or i rarely bowling the odd over or two.Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests