by Dr Cricket » Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:19 pm
TBH not sure newman took Anderson injury issues or recent problems into account.
Only Stokes could have played, playing Anderson on Lords on a slower flatter deck where he getting slower to recover from niggles and his actually missing games because of niggles which he would have played before is a worry.
not risking Anderson is a good move why play anderson at lords if it means he could miss the entire test series.
Most of the time england backroom staff are not idiots they probably know Anderson far better than what Newman knows.
By the way not sure Newman ever played back to back test or First class games either, lets not forget Anderson got 3 test after lords.
quite possible he might only get fit on the 4th day of the lords test and then it becomes a choice of risking him for a lords test and out of the rest of the series or miss lords but play all the other 3 games.
broad said anderson was not playing because lords is a flat deck but did want him in the squad for advice and help purposes.
Obrian is a modern day test cricketer so should know how double or triple back to back test affect bowlers.
Either way quite pathetic to block someone over a different view, especially over something like this where literally no one is wrong or right and is basically an opinion.
only reason this got picked up was because newman didn't know the guy was a test cricketer lol and that is how he treat all people that doesn't agree with him on twitter.
1 Cricket Major
2019 IPL Season.