Good figures despite not holding a test match, the Twenty20 success being the difference from a profit to a loss.
hopeforthebest wrote:Boyd Rankin will not take any further part in this game against Hampshire, after bowling only one over it would be almost more accurate to say 'not take any part in this game'. His loss will be felt even more due to Warks going into this game with only 3 pace bowlers.
Currently Hants are heading for a position where only they can win this game, an excellent partnership from Dawson and Wheater really setting them up to make a big total.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Spinners took seven wickets in the end though.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Spinners took seven wickets in the end though.
Last five went for nine runs when the Hants batters were having a thwack.
Not getting my hopes up that Poysdens four wickets means it'll be a good pitch for Crane.
westoelad wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Spinners took seven wickets in the end though.
Last five went for nine runs when the Hants batters were having a thwack.
Not getting my hopes up that Poysdens four wickets means it'll be a good pitch for Crane.
Good pitch for ducks rather than cranes looking at the weather.
hopeforthebest wrote:Warwickshire batsmen seek ways to get out as Johnathan Trott is out stumped off a pace bowler.
Users browsing this forum: Arthur Crabtree and 1 guest