hopeforthebest wrote:The Independent is reporting Vince had a dislocated finger and is unlikely to be fit for the Oval. I reckon push Moeen up to 4 and bring in another spinner. The Oval is turning quite a lot if the wickets taken are a indication. Time for Asari methinks.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Blimey, no way I'm saying something positive. Don't you get enough enraptured positivity from the media? Me and Bavesh are offering balance.
bhaveshgor wrote:bruv you are deluded if you think england going to beat india in india, why would I say something I don't believe in????
backfootpunch wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:backfootpunch wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:well played england good win also bodes well for india that the seam bowlers got good reverse swing in a dead wicket and that I believe finn or woakes bowled well didn't watch it was at the cinema.
wonder if england will go with a pace heavy attack in india and try to get wickets by reverse swing and not spin.
Could well be 2 spinners and 4 seamers
Unless one of stokes or woakes doesn't play
yep they probably do that I know rich is against the idea, but It might be the best way to go about it and not sure if england got another batsman to replace/vince/bairstow so they might as well play 6 bowlers and have bowlers that provide control and attack at the same time.
spinners bowl till the ball reverse and the pace men get unleashed and at the same time some pace men provide control.
but only works if the ball reverses and all 4 pace men bowl at a world class level.
Stokes will probably be let down alongside the spinners.
but the batting going to very weak, even if they bat till 8 or 9.
but it probably be the best team challenging india the most in india, will certainly be the best bowling attack they can come up with and then hope batting gets a score and does a bit of pakistan here and get a score in most of the test matches.
We are fortunate that moeen, Stokes, woakes and rashid are all capable of making test hundreds
hopeforthebest wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:bruv you are deluded if you think england going to beat india in india, why would I say something I don't believe in????
You're very free with the word Bruv, are you one of those cockneys I've heard so much about.
hopeforthebest wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:backfootpunch wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:well played england good win also bodes well for india that the seam bowlers got good reverse swing in a dead wicket and that I believe finn or woakes bowled well didn't watch it was at the cinema.
wonder if england will go with a pace heavy attack in india and try to get wickets by reverse swing and not spin.
Could well be 2 spinners and 4 seamers
Unless one of stokes or woakes doesn't play
yep they probably do that I know rich is against the idea, but It might be the best way to go about it and not sure if england got another batsman to replace/vince/bairstow so they might as well play 6 bowlers and have bowlers that provide control and attack at the same time.
spinners bowl till the ball reverse and the pace men get unleashed and at the same time some pace men provide control.
but only works if the ball reverses and all 4 pace men bowl at a world class level.
Stokes will probably be let down alongside the spinners.
but the batting going to very weak, even if they bat till 8 or 9.
but it probably be the best team challenging india the most in india, will certainly be the best bowling attack they can come up with and then hope batting gets a score and does a bit of pakistan here and get a score in most of the test matches.
Why don't you make a big effort and try to say something positive about England. We have beaten India on the last three occasions we've played them and just maybe we'll find a way to do it again.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:All India have to do is leave a lush green outfield and there won't be reverse swing, is they did last time. England got reverse for a short while in the third Test, but mostly were pretty toothless.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests