budgetmeansbudget wrote:Is there a way we can find a place for Rashid in the Test side outside of the sub continent? He's going to have some very good days with the ball, but when he doesn't he'll chip in with good runs. I'd like to see him as a mainstay.
hopeforthebest wrote:Cook must have decided to let BD catch up quickly to make the contest even.
dan08 wrote:It's like playing with 9 men with Ballance and Finn in the team.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Is there a way we can find a place for Rashid in the Test side outside of the sub continent? He's going to have some very good days with the ball, but when he doesn't he'll chip in with good runs. I'd like to see him as a mainstay.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Is there a way we can find a place for Rashid in the Test side outside of the sub continent? He's going to have some very good days with the ball, but when he doesn't he'll chip in with good runs. I'd like to see him as a mainstay.
I've always touted for a 'number seven', who contributes with bat and ball, but doesn't quite get in for either, just for their all round potential. What can be dismissed as bits and pieces. But only one in the side. Mo and Stokes both at times have looked like that player, though Stokes maybe would get in just as a bat now. Having two feels to weaken the side though. Maybe Rashid could be that type. A luxury, but potentially a useful one. But currently Mo looks more useful as a 'number seven'.
Examples of Test 'number sevens'.
Craig Matthews
Craig White
Lance Klusener
Brian McMillan
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests