ddb wrote:Bhave do you have to quote posts and put one word for 10 posts? Could all be done in one and no one cares who is right or wrong. It seems like you are just talking to yourself. Clutters the thread as this post does too.
I really think England can draw this, Kohli still finding his way as a captain.
ddb wrote:Bhave do you have to quote posts and put one word for 10 posts? Could all be done in one and no one cares who is right or wrong. It seems like you are just talking to yourself. Clutters the thread as this post does too.
I really think England can draw this, Kohli still finding his way as a captain.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Duckett's place in the side must be helped by how emphatically Ballance was dropped after BD. And that the alternatives would necessitate rearrangement of the batting. If Buttler came in for him, would he slot in at four? Woakes certainly wouldn't. Bairstow and Stokes would have to be moved up.
Bringing Buttler back in feels like another one of those decisions made around the England set up that either must succeed, or risk making those responsible lack credibility (much like bringing back Moores, or recalling Ballance after he had been dropped and then struggled in CC1). Buttler has played one first class match since he was dropped. He was taken out of the the last county game. He's pretty much stopped playing red ball cricket. And yet he may be recalled into this series in unadvantageous circumstances.
I remember in the West Indies commenting that the England squad felt like it was like a stalemate. That there was a certain genius in how many alternatives provided absolutely no options. If Woakes covers for an injured Broad, there's actually no one among the five remaining names that anyone really wants in the team. Possibly Batty could come in for Ansari, but even that would make the spin options appear pretty whitebread .
Arthur Crabtree wrote:And Bell. Maybe England could have done with Colly tomorrow.
They way the openers played seemed quite different from how England normally operate in these situations. Lots of leaves (did India think England would chase the target and so tempted them with wide balls, and put the field back?). Eschewing the supposed reassurance of feeling bat on ball. So maybe the squad has been doing some work on adapting to these sorts of situations.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:And Bell. Maybe England could have done with Colly tomorrow.
They way the openers played seemed quite different from how England normally operate in these situations. Lots of leaves (did India think England would chase the target and so tempted them with wide balls, and put the field back?). Eschewing the supposed reassurance of feeling bat on ball. So maybe the squad has been doing some work on adapting to these sorts of situations.
sussexpob wrote:End of the day, Hameed might have a brilliant defensive technique and a will to bat till the end of time, but he has also over this last two tests missed out on a lot of poor balls because he is so in the mood to not give anything away. If he continues to play like that then he wont make it in cricket, you have to take the easy runs when they are there. I think it was a Yadav ball in the first innings that was a rank half volley, and he patted it back to the bowler.
He is clearly hard to remove, but being that defensive, is he encouraging bowlers to simply bowl at him.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests