bhaveshgor wrote:Selection of umpires are poor consider one is a New Zealand local and the other a Sri Lankan that is hardly recognisable.
2 inexperienced umpires.
GarlicJam wrote:Strange.
What does this "WASP" stand for? I assume that the last two words are Score Predictor.
rich1uk wrote:Win and Score Predictor
for the team batting first it gives a predicted score that changes as the innings goes to reflect whats going on
for the team batting second it gives a percentage chance of winning
was developed by a university in NZ I believe
GarlicJam wrote:rich1uk wrote:Win and Score Predictor
for the team batting first it gives a predicted score that changes as the innings goes to reflect whats going on
for the team batting second it gives a percentage chance of winning
was developed by a university in NZ I believe
Cheers. Is it supposed to predict the winning score, or what NZ will end up with? I have assumed the latter.
bhaveshgor wrote:The par score doesn't change though and can be unrealistic if the commentator don't take it seriously and just give the par score 300 or even 350 now.
Only works if the commentators knows the actual score that gives a team a 50 percent chance of winning the game.
Wasp theory is sound but sadly commentators do ruin it at times, sky Uk were hopeless at it with bumble, knight sometimes getting crazy with the par scores.
rich1uk wrote:who is this heazlett guy playing for australia ?
down to come in at #7 on the card but doesn't bowl, i see he has only played 5 list A games domestically, has an impressive average but thats a very small sample size to be selecting someone based on
after my earlier comments about Stoinis he'll probbaly score a match winning hundred now
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest