mikesiva wrote:Dr Cricket wrote:Picking ishant wasn’t a bad decision it was actually smart and very good logic to it they just dropped the wrong man for bhuvi not that it would have made any difference on this deck, if anything because of the deck it is a marginal call between shami and bhuvi.
Although I think the pro of kumar outweighs the cons of shami.
Either way India fans should be please that one quality pace man can’t get in the team.
Maybe Shami should be the one to make way for the return of Bhuvi for the final Test.
Having said that, Bumrah and Pandya have been fast, but not really that successful.
Then again, it depends what kind of wicket the Wanderers offers.
South Africa 335 all out.
Ashwin 4-113
Ishant 3-46
Adi wrote:mikesiva wrote:Dr Cricket wrote:Picking ishant wasn’t a bad decision it was actually smart and very good logic to it they just dropped the wrong man for bhuvi not that it would have made any difference on this deck, if anything because of the deck it is a marginal call between shami and bhuvi.
Although I think the pro of kumar outweighs the cons of shami.
Either way India fans should be please that one quality pace man can’t get in the team.
Maybe Shami should be the one to make way for the return of Bhuvi for the final Test.
Having said that, Bumrah and Pandya have been fast, but not really that successful.
Then again, it depends what kind of wicket the Wanderers offers.
South Africa 335 all out.
Ashwin 4-113
Ishant 3-46
Mike, Bhuvi and Shami are No. 1 and 2 pacers for us. No way they can be dropped unless unfit.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests