Durhamfootman wrote:3 wickets for Trott?
blimey
DiligentDefence wrote:Could Lancashire not have picked a more revolting shade of green?
Durhamfootman wrote:3 wickets for Trott?
blimey
captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:3 wickets for Trott?
blimey
4 wickets now.
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:3 wickets for Trott?
blimey
4 wickets now.
And Barker 0-82 off 10,and he's only played 1 CC game. Get him signed for Durham pdq whilst he's out of favour
captaincolly wrote:westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:3 wickets for Trott?
blimey
4 wickets now.
And Barker 0-82 off 10,and he's only played 1 CC game. Get him signed for Durham pdq whilst he's out of favour
Now there's an idea! We could swap him for Rimmington.
Alviro Patterson wrote:Yorkshire's batting probably looks better than what it is on paper, Pujara might just click and I reckon Brook will have a good campaign. Bresnan, Hodd, Rashid and Rafiq between 6 and 9 looks solid.
Bowling attack looks weak, not convinced with Coad as his pace is hit me for the white ball game. Would prefer to play Wainman on the basis he bowls left handed. Willey and Plunkett coming in towards the 2nd half could be a psychological boost and Matt Fisher whenever he is fit.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests