Durhamfootman wrote:and he doesn't appear to that formidable a red ball bowler, either
captaincolly wrote:Our opening RL 50 defeat game against Yorkshire on Friday is live on Sky. Afternoon start as it's a daynighter.
westoelad wrote:Pretty certain gate price is £15 but combined T20 and RL50 for £20
https://mobile.twitter.com/MattyWilsonD ... 5581370368
Durhamfootman wrote:FTECB would have just said that stokes wouldn't have been made available to us irrespective of whether he was at IPL or not
captaincolly wrote:Story in the Mail today about how the counties are pushing to get a share of the IPL compensation money that is pocketed by FTECB. Article claims that if such a system had been in place Durham would have made £137,000 from Stokes' deal.
I'm not sure about that given he is a centrally contracted player but it is scandalous how the counties have not been properly compensated for losing players.
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Story in the Mail today about how the counties are pushing to get a share of the IPL compensation money that is pocketed by FTECB. Article claims that if such a system had been in place Durham would have made £137,000 from Stokes' deal.
I'm not sure about that given he is a centrally contracted player but it is scandalous how the counties have not been properly compensated for losing players.
He's centrally contracted on a yearly basis but it's Durham who hold his registration and crucially his career started at Durham. Counties were unaware until this season of the compensation payment which FTECB have received since IPL began. It's been increased from 10% to 20% this season; Counties are proposing that the 20% is shared equally between FTECB and the county.
westoelad wrote:The natives are getting restless with FTECB.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/44148246
Users browsing this forum: captaincolly and 36 guests