Dr Cricket wrote:depends on the run lines and what the odds were though.
if the session lines were low then it could be very abnormal to score that low or like wise very odd to score quickly.
yuppie wrote:Dr Cricket wrote:depends on the run lines and what the odds were though.
if the session lines were low then it could be very abnormal to score that low or like wise very odd to score quickly.
It was a very slow pitch though. India scored 600 runs at less than 3 an over. Australia had to bat to save the test match. With that evidence presented i think its safe to say that the reporters been stitched up. It was not even betting on a maiden to finish the session.
No wonder they are not naming any players.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Can't imagine the money incentive is there for England players. Especially if it's a one off sting rather than steady money as it was for Hansie.
Dr Cricket wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:Can't imagine the money incentive is there for England players. Especially if it's a one off sting rather than steady money as it was for Hansie.
yeah that the reason why Athers can't believe it, he basically said why would any indian, english or Aussie player do it.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests