captaincolly wrote:Squad for tomorrow. The Richardson injury must be fairly serious, it seems ages ago since he hurt his leg.
https://www.durhamccc.co.uk/news-and-me ... t-openers/
southwood wrote:captaincolly wrote:Squad for tomorrow. The Richardson injury must be fairly serious, it seems ages ago since he hurt his leg.
https://www.durhamccc.co.uk/news-and-me ... t-openers/
captaincolly wrote:How can you need 65 runs from an over and a half with 6 wickets left?!
Bizarre innings from Stokes - scoring far too slowly although I wouldn't be surprised if 200 was about 30 over par.
Alviro Patterson wrote:captaincolly wrote:How can you need 65 runs from an over and a half with 6 wickets left?!
Bizarre innings from Stokes - scoring far too slowly although I wouldn't be surprised if 200 was about 30 over par.
Yorkshire's 200 was indeed roughly 30 above par, was a relatively slow wicket particularly when bowling straight and the outfield looked like it got watered down. It wasn't an easy wicket to hit out, Lyth and Tattersall used precision over power to get the boundaries. Durham in comparsion tried swinging from ball one and got bogged down in the opening powerplay to some red hot Yorkshire bowling, particularly by Jack Brooks, who had Stokes in a tangle and was furious at the umpire for not giving a wide ball off a short delivery (despite toe-ending it).
Stokes knock might have looked good on paper, but he had no real interest in winning the game for Durham. He did pick up a knock approx mid-way in the innings and only upped the scoring because Yorkshire's middle overs bowling became increasingly slack at a point where 18 was needed off the final several overs.
westoelad wrote:100 runs off the last 9 overs-12+ per over
captaincolly wrote:Kyle Coetzer re-joining Northants for the T20 blast. Provided he's available for all the games he surely would have improved our side - Northants are stronger than us so if they want him why didn't we?
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Kyle Coetzer re-joining Northants for the T20 blast. Provided he's available for all the games he surely would have improved our side - Northants are stronger than us so if they want him why didn't we?
I wonder if he was going to be the signing that was "imminent" according to Marty.
Same side tonight, no doubt, aside from Harte for Stokes.
What's that about repeating the same thing and expecting a different outcome?
captaincolly wrote:Lost the toss and have been put in. Looks as if Davies is in for Stokes and BBC card has Colly opening again!
Is Harte injured? Surely he'd be a better replacement for Stokes.
andy wrote:119-5 4 overs to go
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests