Durhamfootman wrote:Adam Lyth is trying to do just that with 38 off 16
Almost did it. Lancs win by 1 run.
Durhamfootman wrote:Adam Lyth is trying to do just that with 38 off 16
Durhamfootman wrote:and yet LT is not there to bowl, so they must think, or want to find out if, he has batting potential
there were many stranger decisions made around the counties tonight....
Williamson coming in for Yorks after Plunkett and Bresnan in a match where they lost by 1 run and he couldn't hit the winning runs with the second ball he faced
Elliott coming into bat after a 21 yo bowler in a match where they also failed to hit the winning runs, with Elliott not facing a ball
these are all highly paid professional T20 boys.... why are they not taking personal responsibility in the tightest situations?
why are they being allowed to not take responsibility by the counties who pay through the nose for their services?
I just don't understand it
westoelad wrote:Persisting with Trevaskis is a bit of a mystery. Tells you more about Pringle and where he is in the set up. Finger injury my rse
Durhamfootman wrote:easy to forget, of course, despite the criticism, that things are going very well. Which makes a very pleasant change
12 months ago we were embarrassingly bad at home
not just bad..... embarrassingly bad
Durhamfootman wrote:once in a while it might come off, but the rest of the time it just hands the initiative back to the opposition, imo
Durhamfootman wrote:I always make a point of never coming up with a plan where Poynter is the solution
always feels a bit like thanking our lucky stars that we have Wor Nige's capable ministrations keeping us injury free
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 125 guests