Durhamfootman wrote:captaincolly wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:1-2 after 2 overs
fair to say it may not be going to plan
I did wonder if bowling first was a risk, we seem better suited to defending average scores than chasing them.
I absolutely agree with that
I suppose with rain around the thinking might have been that batting second could be advantageous but I think we are always going to have a problem chasing. Batting lineup looks very iffy.
Durhamfootman wrote:I'm not entirely sure, but I think that may be what is known in the trade as a *modded* disaster
Definitely. 78 runs and Poynter/Davies got 50 of them!