Durhamfootman wrote:Taylor gone.
Good wicket to get because he might have lifted them to somewhere near 250 if he'd batted through
Durhamfootman wrote:good info
I'll look more closely on Friday
668 said she saw a sleeping bag in the crowd and wondered if that was corkers
got to be a die hard if you take a sleeping bag to matches. Would make a good protest about the way the CC is being scheduled if it was properly co-ordinated around the country, although it would probably require a lot of research at the library cross checking membership details and telephone numbers from registers, electoral rolls, phone books and such like.......... If only there was some other global medium to organise something like that......
southwood wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:good info
I'll look more closely on Friday
668 said she saw a sleeping bag in the crowd and wondered if that was corkers
got to be a die hard if you take a sleeping bag to matches. Would make a good protest about the way the CC is being scheduled if it was properly co-ordinated around the country, although it would probably require a lot of research at the library cross checking membership details and telephone numbers from registers, electoral rolls, phone books and such like.......... If only there was some other global medium to organise something like that......
Corkers does not go to the 1 dayers now. I kept him up to date by text. He was however fully in a sleeping bag during the saturday of the Sussex match . We both sat in the upper tier of the county stand on Friday ( and froze despite the sleeping bag protection.)
Was 668 at the Sussex game or the 1 day game on Wed ? I was there on Wed too but didn't see her even though I walked around the ground .
Thought Burnham was a lot better today ( Friday) but despite good knocks on both days from Scott Steel he seems to have a red mist moment and gave his wicket away on both occasion. It is neverless very encouraging to see yet another Academy product step up a grade. A few more innings will see him in the CC team .
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote: interesting info that the pitch for this game and Friday's is an artificial one - it gets cut and rolled but is still artificial being used by the FTECB as an experiment. Assuming the experiment is being repeated around the country it might be a reason why there were a lot of similar(ish) scores in the mid-300's in the first innings of games today. Decent weather and similar pitches.
Is it not a "drop in" pitch rather than artificial one if it can be cut and rolled?
southwood wrote:
Was 668 at the Sussex game or the 1 day game on Wed ? I was there on Wed too but didn't see her even though I walked around the ground .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 139 guests