

Durhamfootman wrote:in the full and certain knowledge that he'll only have to bowl 3 balls in that last over
Indeed!Durhamfootman wrote:worth mentioning that I have no idea why Burnham was fielding at 3rd slip when he missed catching Wells the other day. His fielding today out on the square leg boundary was very ordinary at best...... yes he took the 2 catches, but they were dollies and he missed saving a couple of boundaries... one of which he misjudged, ran too far and watched the ball bounce over the spot where he'd been standing just a split second before. He dropped quite a few of his warm up catches during the interval and seemed to struggle with the pick up and throw exercises. I confess my heart was in my mouth when Wakeley and then Holder lobbed the ball towards him. I was certain he was going to drop them...... although he didn't. Still.......... he doesn't strike me as being the safest pair of hands for such a crucial fielding position as 3rd slip in a championship match
Durhamfootman wrote:Durhamfootman wrote:worth mentioning that I have no idea why Burnham was fielding at 3rd slip when he missed catching Wells the other day. His fielding today out on the square leg boundary was very ordinary at best...... yes he took the 2 catches, but they were dollies and he missed saving a couple of boundaries... one of which he misjudged, ran too far and watched the ball bounce over the spot where he'd been standing just a split second before. He dropped quite a few of his warm up catches during the interval and seemed to struggle with the pick up and throw exercises. I confess my heart was in my mouth when Wakeley and then Holder lobbed the ball towards him. I was certain he was going to drop them...... although he didn't. Still.......... he doesn't strike me as being the safest pair of hands for such a crucial fielding position as 3rd slip in a championship match
turns out that Burnham dropped Bunny just before he launched the match winning pair of sixes into the distance....... after that reprieve he must have felt that it was his day
westoelad wrote:KingOttis wrote:westoelad wrote:Just knew when it got to squeaky bum time that the traitor would play a successful cameo.
Traitor! No way. Excelled for years, and never let us down, playing a vital part in our success. If anything, he was let down by Durham. Still there's always Rimmington to fall back on...
It was tongue in cheek. Durham, I believe, offered him a provisional deal for the 2nd year which was perfectly reasonable. He was also demanding a coaching role- you can't just conjure them out of thin air. I can't help thinking his agent was the agent-provocateur. Can't believe he'd have wanted to disrupt his kids' schooling.
KingOttis wrote:Apologies for missing the subtlety. I'm still lightly seething about the Onions decision, and think it was a big mistake, and a pretty shoddy way to treat a club legend. Should probably let it go now, and stop spluttering with indignation....
Durhamfootman wrote:and now I find that he also dropped Jones in the final over
ball follows him around, doesn't it
captaincolly wrote:Wood ( but not Stokes) is in the squad tomorrow alongside Pringle & Eckersley with Clark and Weighell omitted. Harte is still in so I guess it's a choice between him & Eckersley to replace Clark.
The forecast isn't great with around 50% chance of rain throughout the afternoon so there's a good chance DL will come into play once more.
westoelad wrote:captaincolly wrote:Wood ( but not Stokes) is in the squad tomorrow alongside Pringle & Eckersley with Clark and Weighell omitted. Harte is still in so I guess it's a choice between him & Eckersley to replace Clark.
The forecast isn't great with around 50% chance of rain throughout the afternoon so there's a good chance DL will come into play once more.
Yes, Wood for Weighell is a straight choice and I suspect Pringle is named offering a 2nd spin option with it being an unknown venue. I suspect it'll be Eckersley for Clark, Bangers finding dual role of captaincy and w/k too onerous?

westoelad wrote:Hope has been expressed that Wood can serve up a couple of snorters for Hales

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 104 guests