Surely Eckersley should be playing. The games we've won were thanks to the openers. The middle order looks very iffy. Lees did pretty well and Handscomb is a quality player but not sure about the rest of them!
Durhamfootman wrote:I had an early night, tonight
I went home at 131-8. I'd seen this game before and I knew what the ending looked like, so I saved myself the grief of death by a thousand cuts
masterclass in the field from Lancs. This was the first home game where we were completely unable to turn ones into two's which is why the score was so far under par. If we were to have any chance against a side like Lancs it was going to be our top order who would have to do it. Steel lost his patience after two dot balls, stepped across a short ball and tried to spoon it over the keepers head, but instead he just lobbed it into the keepers hands..... to which Vilas said "thank you very much". Dame D'Arcy top edged a pull shot straight up into the air... to which Vilas said "thank you very much", and then Clark somehow missed a straight one from Parkinson when well set. Not sure whether the ball turned more than he thought, less than he thought, or it was slower than he thought, but he ended up being done like a kipper. After that we fiddled about in true Durham circa 2004-2010 style. Not only could we not turn ones into twos, but Lancs were also working hard turning fours into twos. The great leader shovelled one over to long off, somebody else missed another straight one from Parkinson and I'd seen enough. Parkinson took 2 good wickets in his first over where he deceived the batsmen, but after that we just threw our wickets at him
Lancs were terrific in the field. Bags of energy, the field constantly changing. They chased everything down and they appeared to be communicating with hand signals, which is not something I've seen before, so it intrigued me. It was like watching the old style bookies at a race track, but it's clearly something they've worked on because everyone seemed to know what they were doing. It was a masterful performance in the field, really. I have no idea how many times we found the boundary, but it can't have been many and it certainly couldn't have been enough to win a world cup![]()
One very humorous moment early in our innings. Mahmood (no, the other one) conceded his first runs after Steel defended the ball to cover or point (I couldn't tell which from my vantage point), making no attempt to run........ the fielder threw the ball hard at Vilas who was running in towards the stumps. The ball was aimed slightly behind Vilas who lost his footing as he turned to take the ball, missed it and it ran away to the fine leg fielder who was up on the circle. He somehow contrived to dive over the top of the ball and it ran away for four. Absolutely comical to watch for everyone, except Mahmood who was spitting feathers. Probably got the biggest cheer of the night.... might have been the only thing worth cheering. There was one other mis-field late in the innings which might have been the only time we turned a one into a two
All in all, a thoroughly disappointing, but largely predictable night
Durhamfootman wrote:did feel bigger than the Northants game, once all the stragglers arrived
because of the traffic problems the other night on Park Rd Central, I drove in from the Front St. Driving down Ropery lane there were a lot of people heading to the ground.... almost a continuous stream of punters from the top of the road to the bottom, which was good to see
the only down side that perhaps needs attention is the parking at the ground. Fortunately it doesn't affect me, but once the whole area (including grassy areas) has been filled up (and it was even full on Wed evening) it seems to take a long time to get the cars away. That might end up becoming a deterrent just as gates are beginning on an upward trend. Might require some additional thought.
Players seem to be on autograph duty after every game, atm, which I heartily approve of
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests