bigfluffylemon wrote:Tyring to see if I could back up my belief that not having a specialist spinner doesn't work out, even in England. It's hard to interrogate the stats for this - while cricinfo does flag bowlers as spinners or pace, you can't filter by whether a player of a particular type was playing, only if they took wickets
You can filter by what type of bowler is playing, but the filter counts every single player who has bowled an over of that type in FC history. So as an example, Zak Crawley would be counted as a spinner in any match he plays, courtesy of 66 balls of offspin for Kent. There is a pretty easy way to work this out in a couple of stages.
Since 2010, England have fielded the following spinners.
https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engin ... pe=bowling
Since 2010, 84 matches out have included one of the specialists in the above list
https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engin ... ;type=team
Since 2010, there has been 88 overall matches
https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engin ... ;type=team
In the 4 matches that England did not play a specialist spinner they have drawn 3 and lost 1. They have never won a game in the data sample without fielding one spinner.
These are South Africa in 2012 - Match Drawn.
https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/sou ... -scorecard
New Zealand 2021 - Drawn
https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/new ... -scorecard
New Zealand 2021 - Lost
https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/new ... -scorecard
India 2021 - Drawn
https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/ind ... -scorecard

