Arthur Crabtree wrote:I was a bit unhappy with the commentators- particularly Vaughan- digging their claws into Pope's captaincy. Any periods of play without a wicket were due to his lack of inspiration. You'd think Stokes never lost/drew a game, despite England bowling India to a draw over five sessions in the previous Test! Nothing about the five (six if you count Duckett's half chance) drops by players positioned by the skipper. Or the limited bowling options.
I guess you are referring to Vaughan's comments after play yesterday on TMS, which I cranked on after the close while making dinner. I think he said with Stokes, he felt England could beat any side, with Pope they could lose to any side, such is the difference in leadership. Pope has a better win record than Stokes even if he loses this test, and look at Pakistan where England bowled out Pakistan twice on a road after scoring their best ever overseas score in the test... and then were battered when Stokes came back and lost the series.
I think I have made it clear what I think about this Stokes cult of personality. People assume I dislike him, but I just have no time for this OTT nonsense. Why is he a tactical master? He lost 4-1 in India, we didn't win the home Ashes, we are now looking incredibly unlikely to beat an Indian team who have lost 6 of their first team in a year and are in deep transition, and we lost away in Pakistan badly in those two tests. Its like English commentators are trying to gaslight us into this idea England are a generational side, lead by an inspirational, tactical genius.
99% of the time Stokes goes for the standard 3 slipper field, or if a partnership develops the pacers go half trackers and he has the short leg, two men deep behind square. He pretty much never has a field that isn't that. Pope on the other hand realised Jaiswal's release shot to the short ball is the uppercut and got him out by posting Overton out for the shot and getting them short and offside. He had previously put a man in an unorthodox fly leg slip realising he flicks in the air behind square off his pads, and Duckett dropped the catch when Jaiswal fell into the trap.
I think both of those examples are more than you could say of Stokes thinking a batsman out this series.