westoelad wrote:22 wickets in 1st day at Turnton. Pitch inspectors surely.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:westoelad wrote:22 wickets in 1st day at Turnton. Pitch inspectors surely.
Turnton!
westoelad wrote:22 wickets in 1st day at Turnton. Pitch inspectors surely.
Durhamfootman wrote:westoelad wrote:22 wickets in 1st day at Turnton. Pitch inspectors surely.
Do they do that any more? Seems to me they'll look at Gregory flogging a rapid 60 and call the other 21 wickets bad batting
yet this is a game that could conceivably be over by lunch on day 2, which is utterly ludicrous. It's not often that I cheer Surrey on, but Somerset must not be allowed to profit by preparing this sort of rubbish, so this year I will be
Durhamfootman wrote:Remember when Justin Kemp flogged a big score at Stockton on an unplayable deck, by charging down the pitch and not letting the ball touch the ground? Perhaps this was Gregory's technique
Well before the 22nd wicket of the day had fallen, the foremen on social media were declaring that Somerset had doctored this Taunton pitch and breached the terms of the probation imposed after the Middlesex match nearly a year ago.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests