rich1uk wrote:Iamthewalrus wrote:rich1uk wrote:D/L wrote:rich1uk wrote:the one thing that does make me chuckle about this thread is the same people who are outraged by KP wanting to supposedly pick and choose what games he plays in are those who wouldn't want him playing in the first place
Chuckle away, but that’s simply not true. Pietersen is a good batsman and good enough to play in all forms of cricket. I, for one, have never criticised his selection.
However, I would criticise an individual who, of his own free will and in full knowledge of the commitment he was making, signed a twelve month contract with one of his employers, an employer who employs other people on an identical basis, and then expects that employer to make special dispensation for just one of them.
you mean like when strauss was allowed to miss the tour to bangladesh a few years ago , despite it including tests and despite him being the team captain, that sort of special dispensation that no-one has ever had in the past ?
Strauss wanted a rest because he was playing to much cricket for his country. KP wants a rest because he's tired. One of the reasons he is, the IPL. Please note that at the time, I was against our captain (Strauss) resting but there is a difference.
how do you know he asked for rest because he played in the IPL and that he wouldn't have asked for the same consideration even if he hadn't played in the IPL ?
"Oh, so you're ok to play in the IPL but not for us? Well tough"
asking to miss a few ODIs is a whole lot different to the captain missing a whole tour including tests
I don't and I doubt he mentioned the IPL but the ECB would have seen it like that, I'm certain of that.
"Oh, so you're ok to play in the IPL but not for England? Well tough"

