ddb wrote:sportbloggeradi wrote:Practically life has moved on for England when he was not there for ODI series. In fact they won it 4-0. England has enough quality players to stand on their own in battign, bowling and fielding skillsets. It is not that England will never win a test match without KP. They will win, i bet. It is not that England are like WestIndies or some other weaker team who rely on one and only one cricketer to win a test. Cook, Struass, Trott and Bell are quality test match players. Anderson, Swann and Broad are match winners. Together with a settled team they will perform as good or much better. As for KP's replacement, it will take time and ECB know it if we know it. Fans on forums including me want a team of my own with players of my choice. IMO ECB have a better vision about English cricket than we have commenting form our home or office. The decision they have taken is not for funs sake. There is something which made them take the decision.
Long term I can buy that England could get stronger. For Thursday, no chance. You named 3 bowlers who are matchwinners, funnily enough no batsmen. Without his innings in SL or in this series it is possible that England would have lost 7 tests in 10 rather than 5. But that gets away from the point that dropping him under the reason of texts doesn't seem right, however good/bad he is.
I would agree in normal circumstances and if Bell/Cook had done the same thing it would be harsh, but with KP this is the straw that has broke the camels back.


