OffStumpYorker wrote:i dont know what else the ecb could have done given the circumstances?
sussexpob wrote:So far the England first 4 wickets have scored a third of what KP did in the last tests first innings... we dont need him though.

Alviro Patterson wrote:sussexpob wrote:So far the England first 4 wickets have scored a third of what KP did in the last tests first innings... we dont need him though.
So far being the operative word
sussexpob wrote:So far the England first 4 wickets have scored a third of what KP did in the last tests first innings... we dont need him though.
sussexpob wrote:Alviro Patterson wrote:sussexpob wrote:So far the England first 4 wickets have scored a third of what KP did in the last tests first innings... we dont need him though.
So far being the operative word
Not really.... said four batsman are out and arent going to score anymore runs.

OffStumpYorker wrote:a_c, yes it could have been dine that way but there are other players that are just as deserving of a rest over kp, i believe swann has actually playrd more games than kp yet suggestions about resting hjm are met with derision and the response "but hes only a spinner".
kp apologists dont see this as double standards even though i do.
in the end and ive stated this many times no player is bigger than the team and no player is bullet proof.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest