DeltaAlpha wrote:Am I allowed to go for Gary Player, the golfer?
sussexpob wrote:DeltaAlpha wrote:Am I allowed to go for Gary Player, the golfer?
Only if I can have Gary Glitter... regardless of his sexual preferences, he did write Rock n Roll Part 2 which is absolute MEGA TUNAGE!!!
sussexpob wrote:DeltaAlpha wrote:Am I allowed to go for Gary Player, the golfer?
Only if I can have Gary Glitter... regardless of his sexual preferences, he did write Rock n Roll Part 2 which is absolute MEGA TUNAGE!!!
GarlicJam wrote:sussexpob wrote:DeltaAlpha wrote:Am I allowed to go for Gary Player, the golfer?
Only if I can have Gary Glitter... regardless of his sexual preferences, he did write Rock n Roll Part 2 which is absolute MEGA TUNAGE!!!
Your morality is bizarre. You wish physical pain on a person who, at worst, misled a sports team you support and rejoiced in him being injured, yet you claim favouritism for a disgusting, perverted criminal who made the lives of many children a misery, for his sexual gratification. Because you like a song. Stunning.
very poor comebacksussexpob wrote:GarlicJam wrote:sussexpob wrote:DeltaAlpha wrote:Am I allowed to go for Gary Player, the golfer?
Only if I can have Gary Glitter... regardless of his sexual preferences, he did write Rock n Roll Part 2 which is absolute MEGA TUNAGE!!!
Your morality is bizarre. You wish physical pain on a person who, at worst, misled a sports team you support and rejoiced in him being injured, yet you claim favouritism for a disgusting, perverted criminal who made the lives of many children a misery, for his sexual gratification. Because you like a song. Stunning.
Is it too early to joke about Glitter then?
GarlicJam wrote:very poor comebacksussexpob wrote:GarlicJam wrote:sussexpob wrote:DeltaAlpha wrote:Am I allowed to go for Gary Player, the golfer?
Only if I can have Gary Glitter... regardless of his sexual preferences, he did write Rock n Roll Part 2 which is absolute MEGA TUNAGE!!!
Your morality is bizarre. You wish physical pain on a person who, at worst, misled a sports team you support and rejoiced in him being injured, yet you claim favouritism for a disgusting, perverted criminal who made the lives of many children a misery, for his sexual gratification. Because you like a song. Stunning.
Is it too early to joke about Glitter then?
GarlicJam wrote:A bit inaccurate there. I will admit that the Harris situation has gotten decidedly worse (by appearances) than when I posted that. At the time, the rumour going around was that he had "inappropriately touched a girl on the bottom", not the "quite a list". The subsequent second arrest certainly has made things look worse, and in the wake of this, I do regret posting about him.
However, there aren't even (official) allegations yet, he hasn't even been named (although I am not saying he isn't "Yew 5" or whatever codeword the cops have given him). Unlike the trail of filth and depravity that has been Gadd's life. Surprising that someone as intelligent as you has tied the two together.
Return to Cricket Opinion Polls
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests