KipperJohn wrote:Just to lighten the mood, nice pic of Ian Bell who obviously has more important things on his mind.
Aidan11 wrote:The problem in all walks of life is that there are "yes men" - the people who do as they are told and just accept situations they may not agree with, and there are those who speak out and challenge things if they are not happy with a situation.
It is the latter who, because they dare speak out, are deemed troublesome or disruptive.
It's a fine line.
Aidan11 wrote:The problem in all walks of life is that there are "yes men" - the people who do as they are told and just accept situations they may not agree with, and there are those who speak out and challenge things if they are not happy with a situation.
It is the latter who, because they dare speak out, are deemed troublesome or disruptive.
It's a fine line.
Dr Robert wrote:Aidan11 wrote:The problem in all walks of life is that there are "yes men" - the people who do as they are told and just accept situations they may not agree with, and there are those who speak out and challenge things if they are not happy with a situation.
It is the latter who, because they dare speak out, are deemed troublesome or disruptive.
It's a fine line.
You mentioned Roy Keane earlier, who is not a 'yes' man at all. I doubt though Keane will be moaning about bullying in his book. I'm a bit on the fence with KP. He can play the victim quite well, whilst at the same time has been one.
budgetmeansbudget wrote:Dr Robert wrote:Aidan11 wrote:The problem in all walks of life is that there are "yes men" - the people who do as they are told and just accept situations they may not agree with, and there are those who speak out and challenge things if they are not happy with a situation.
It is the latter who, because they dare speak out, are deemed troublesome or disruptive.
It's a fine line.
You mentioned Roy Keane earlier, who is not a 'yes' man at all. I doubt though Keane will be moaning about bullying in his book. I'm a bit on the fence with KP. He can play the victim quite well, whilst at the same time has been one.
I read his first autobiography, massive ego, he was always right, pissed off alot of people, just like Pietersen.
Dr Robert wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Dr Robert wrote:Aidan11 wrote:The problem in all walks of life is that there are "yes men" - the people who do as they are told and just accept situations they may not agree with, and there are those who speak out and challenge things if they are not happy with a situation.
It is the latter who, because they dare speak out, are deemed troublesome or disruptive.
It's a fine line.
You mentioned Roy Keane earlier, who is not a 'yes' man at all. I doubt though Keane will be moaning about bullying in his book. I'm a bit on the fence with KP. He can play the victim quite well, whilst at the same time has been one.
I read his first autobiography, massive ego, he was always right, pissed off alot of people, just like Pietersen.
I dare say. He does say it like it is, to who he likes though. Miss him on ITV, even though I thought he talked crap a lot of the time.
Dr Robert wrote:budgetmeansbudget wrote:Dr Robert wrote:Aidan11 wrote:The problem in all walks of life is that there are "yes men" - the people who do as they are told and just accept situations they may not agree with, and there are those who speak out and challenge things if they are not happy with a situation.
It is the latter who, because they dare speak out, are deemed troublesome or disruptive.
It's a fine line.
You mentioned Roy Keane earlier, who is not a 'yes' man at all. I doubt though Keane will be moaning about bullying in his book. I'm a bit on the fence with KP. He can play the victim quite well, whilst at the same time has been one.
I read his first autobiography, massive ego, he was always right, pissed off alot of people, just like Pietersen.
I dare say. He does say it like it is, to who he likes though. Miss him on ITV, even though I thought he talked crap a lot of the time.
SaintPowelly wrote:Also, if players have to apologise for dropping catches, wouldn't it of been easier for Prior to get a "sorry" tattoo on his forehead.

budgetmeansbudget wrote:Aidan11 wrote:The problem in all walks of life is that there are "yes men" - the people who do as they are told and just accept situations they may not agree with, and there are those who speak out and challenge things if they are not happy with a situation.
It is the latter who, because they dare speak out, are deemed troublesome or disruptive.
It's a fine line.
And there are some who would rather do their speaking out in the public domain.
Dr Robert wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Also, if players have to apologise for dropping catches, wouldn't it of been easier for Prior to get a "sorry" tattoo on his forehead.
That bit did make me squirm. Having to apologise for a dropped catch
SaintPowelly wrote:Dr Robert wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:Also, if players have to apologise for dropping catches, wouldn't it of been easier for Prior to get a "sorry" tattoo on his forehead.
That bit did make me squirm. Having to apologise for a dropped catch
I always hated Ryan Sidebottom giving players a b*llocking, probably explains why Monty went off the rails.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests