SaintPowelly wrote:But in his book, he says he wants to play for England again, which contradicts his reasons for not playing LVCC.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:But in his book, he says he wants to play for England again, which contradicts his reasons for not playing LVCC.
Pretty sure he knows that can't happen while Giles Clarke is there. Playing for England is something he never stopped wanting. But it's hardly realistic. He's said in interviews that if the ECB gave an indication they'd consider him, he'd try and do whatever it took to get back in the side.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:clubcricketeradi wrote:Not only sacked, they negatively publicized to each and every company giving an impression that he was the only culprit as far as team spirit and loss was concerned. Luckily, other companies (read IPL) knew only he was the most valued person in that company. I do not see a point in a cricketer making his comeback under a management in which he has no faith left whatsoever.
Yet he did that over and over again. Most abjectly during the reintegration process before the India tour. And it seems he's be willing to do it again. I think it's hard to get away from the conclusion that playing international cricket means everything to him. Even when he had his child, and he wanted to cut back on playing ODIs, feeling he was playing too much cricket, he went back to playing it all rather than risk not having any of it.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:An occasional television interview after scoring a century for Surrey would have put egg on the faces of those who sat in judgement on him, a sweeter revenge than the process he has chosen and who knows, heads might have rolled by now. Maybe he avoided the CC because he recognised that his cricketing skills were diminished and dare not take the risk.
Rather than just point out where he felt they had treated him badly? They ended his contract because they did't want him because of his attitude, not because he couldn't score enough runs.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:When we fall in love (and people have that depth of passion about their country) and break up, we resent the life our partner has after we have gone.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Because they told him they weren't going to pick him... It wasn't a runs related sacking.
I remember when Don Revie was sacked as England manager, and he went to coach in Saudi Arabia, the press were appalled. He had been sacked, but they acted like a life after being on England duty was inconceivable. Almost like they actually expected him to throw himself onto a sword in Trafalgar Square, draped in a St George's cross. Bobby Robson got the same sort of treatment.
That's not a realistic sentiment, but it is at play even today. Why do sports people continually get compared to soldiers, as if, in some alternative, symbolic way, they should die for their country. People resent them their choices. The possibility of a different, possibly better life.
When we fall in love (and people have that depth of passion about their country) and break up, we resent the life our partner has after we have gone.
hopeforthebest wrote:
You have a much better ability to read minds that I, couldn't it be that they looked at his recent record with the bat and his injury record so their decision was a combination of several things.
hopeforthebest wrote:His passion for country has returned to South Africa according to Pietersen himself.
Dr Robert wrote:Have you bought the book yet, Arthur?
Arthur Crabtree wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:His passion for country has returned to South Africa according to Pietersen himself.
As I said above, he regrets denying his roots when he came to England, and the tattoo. But he loves the UK, and had a right to play cricket for England. he took the role of England player more seriously than many have over the years, in terms of preparation. Playing for England clearly meant a hell of a lot to him, and he shed a lot of dignity in order to do so.
Return to International Cricket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests