hopeforthebest wrote:Arthur Crabtree wrote:SaintPowelly wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:In 2012 KP was reintegrated into the England team primarily because Cook believed he needed him and so it proved in India when his batting played an important role in winning that series. However in 2013 his performances fell away so much that in 23 innings he managed only one century and six half centuries. If that didn't make it easy for them to decide that they no longer needed him I'll be amazed. The chances are that if it had been 6 centuries and 1 half century he'd still have been an England player.
What year was it he retired from ODIs ? then threw a tantrum ? was that pre-2012 ??
But as we know, the whole eleven were spiraling. KP covers that in his belief that micromanagement and the tour programme was burning the players out. If KP had to go on that account, so did Bell and Cook (and Trott and Prior).
They were not regarded as trouble makers as far as I know. But there you again using the 'comparisons of form when the subject is Pietersen. I should point out that at the end of the ashes series before he resigned, Flower said every player would be required to play CC cricket to prove their worth. Cook scored 386 runs in 3 games with 2 centuries, Bell 506 runs in 4 games with 2 centuries, both Prior and Trott well incapacitated. So the return of Cook and Bell was confirmed by their county form.
Didn't Prior play the first game and get a ton ?? before his calf/achilies started playing up ?
