Arthur Crabtree wrote:Did Bell rise in the order through a lack of alternatives? He probably did because of good performances lower in the order, and latterly, because he wanted to bat at three. Though he may be there now because of a lack of options.
sussexpob wrote:hopeforthebest wrote: I know players see it as more prestigious to bat high in the order but at the end of the day they should bat where they are likely to offer greater value. Bell has risen up the order through lack of alternatives and stayed there for a similar reason.
Currently Moeen is going through a similar process and the experiment of Trott opening in the WI was another example.
There is merit to that argument, but two main issues I have with it are:-
1. There is no reason why he fails at 3 more. His record in England in conditions where one drop is hardest, is to average 61. And he has done that against a mix of Australia, South Africa and India, all at the time the respective best teams in the world. IF he can make runs at 3 in these conditions, then there is no technical reason why he cant play 3.
2. Bad performance is bad performance playing in any role.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Nothing there for the bowlers. No spin yet though. New ball in six overs so we might not see much spin in the first session.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests