backfootpunch wrote:Making_Splinters wrote:Interesting reading Bayliss' thoughts after the win especially about Compton. Here's a bloke who was harshly dropped from the Test side then turned in two very good performances in trying circumstances to prevent England collapsing in a heap twice in the same Test, yet:
"Ultimately, I'd like to see two of the top three guys as attacking-style batters," Bayliss said. "I just think if you have a couple of attacking guys up the top it puts pressure on the opposition a lot easier."
Talk about ungrateful.
previously i would agree with him but after a year of 40-3 after 40-3 i am glad we have someone who can grind out 80 off 240 balls
Even with Compton in the side, we were still 40 odd for 3 in the first innings of the first test.
It's become such the norm in recent times that the team seems to need to lose early wickets to build a good innings.
Possibly 100 for 1 will lead to panic as it would be uncharted waters of comfortability for many in the team, leading to complacency and the all too familiar middle order collapses of the past!