bhaveshgor wrote:Saying that if ICC are being fair, they would give this pitch a warning.
But seeing how pathetic and bias ICC are in terms of judging pitches I doubt it would happen.
Abu Dhabi, Perth didn't even get a warning.
Trent Bridge only got one because England complained lol.
Really the pitches shouldn't have to be complained by one team for it to be sanctioned.
mikesiva wrote:bhaveshgor wrote:Saying that if ICC are being fair, they would give this pitch a warning.
But seeing how pathetic and bias ICC are in terms of judging pitches I doubt it would happen.
Abu Dhabi, Perth didn't even get a warning.
Trent Bridge only got one because England complained lol.
Really the pitches shouldn't have to be complained by one team for it to be sanctioned.
South Africa 400-3 now...it does seem that batsman-friendly pitches are treated differently from bowler-friendly pitches.
The thing is, while the former produces boring cricket, the latter produces exciting cricket. The ICC need to be more balanced in the way they address this issue.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Maybe the tempo will change once SA get past the follow on.
Time for Cook to have a bowl. He has a Test wicket.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:SA going past England is the Abu Dhabi scenario, when putting fresh bowlers on a day five pitch suddenly transformed the game. Still some way off that.

Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests