Arthur Crabtree wrote:captaincolly wrote:Yes, I agree. Athers ratings are a bit odd as Cook has 8 as does Bairstow.
Stephen Cook? He only played in one game...
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Hales 2
Cook 2
Compton 3
Root 7
Taylor 3
Bairstow 6
Stokes 8
Moeen 4
Finn 6
Broad 7
Anderson 2
Woakes 1
bigfluffylemon wrote:Plus Broad, 18 series wickets at 20 only merits a 7? He was by far England's most consistent bowling performer.
shankycricket wrote:Surely Chris Woakes can't get picked as a frontline test bowler? And please don't trot out the inexperience excuse. He has played 6 Tests now, which is a decent sample size for a bowler (unlike batsmen, its not like they get only 2 chances). He just doesn't seem capable of getting wickets, you can't be unlucky all the time. Just not good enough, sorry.
Arthur Crabtree wrote:Lara in SL was a ten. Or Harbhajan v the Aussies in 2001. Freddie in 2005 is a 9. Eight for Stokes is a high mark.
backfootpunch wrote:agree with what bob willis said on the verdict
england have 5 very very good players
cook, root, stokes, broad and jimmy
as of now the rest aren't up to scratch
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests