yuppie wrote:Few welcome boundaries, lead over 200.
Question is will either team take a risk to win the game, or both happy with the draw?
alfie wrote:yuppie wrote:Few welcome boundaries, lead over 200.
Question is will either team take a risk to win the game, or both happy with the draw?
Well I doubt Cook would be willing to offer Pakistan under 300 to make in a day.
I know you are recalling the great Australian teams , Yuppie : and I'd suggest that if he had Warne and McGrath instead of Moeen and Finn tomorrow he might be a bit more adventurous
st_brendy wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:Vince goes in the same old apparently dicing outside off. Pakistan must over the moon with the position they find themselves in. If Vince plays at the Oval it will be a dereliction of duty by the selectors. 34% S/R on a pitch that's a made for batting and the team is looking to set a total to try and win is pathetic. No need to race along but a crawl is too much.
He scored 12 fewer runs than Hales from 8 fewer balls. That's it. And Hales has had praised showered on him for his innings. Christ, you really have got it in for the lad. A lad who is under immense pressure, trying to fight for his place in the team (and against a side who kept on bowling some way outside of the offstump to him).
Criticise the selectors for picking him in the first place, by all means (all of his innings prior to this one have generally gone by the book. Lots of pretty 4s, not much running between the wickets, lots of starts, lots of nicking off. If the selectors didn't want that, they shouldn't have picked him). I'm totally fine with that. Even as a Hampshire fan, I'd have never selected him for the test team. But don't criticise the selectors for picking him in the last test (if they do pick him), on the basis on him averaging over 40 in this match. In the first innings, only Cook and Bairstow had better SRs, if you're that desperate to bring it into the equation.
Return to Live Cricket Matches
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests